2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13075-017-1251-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social media for arthritis-related comparative effectiveness and safety research and the impact of direct-to-consumer advertising

Abstract: BackgroundSocial media may complement traditional data sources to answer comparative effectiveness/safety questions after medication licensure.MethodsThe Treato platform was used to analyze all publicly available social media data including Facebook, blogs, and discussion boards for posts mentioning inflammatory arthritis (e.g. rheumatoid, psoriatic). Safety events were self-reported by patients and mapped to medical ontologies, resolving synonyms. Disease and symptom-related treatment indications were manuall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, we used advanced informatics methods on large amounts of social media data over 5 years to detect rare signals not easily identifiable in clinical studies. [27][28][29] Our methods identified a few reports of possible SSTIs from AIT and influenza vaccine, data that support that both procedures pose no meaningful infection risk. The frequency with which we observed AIT-related posts that suggest a potential associated SSTI and the frequency with which we identified influenza vaccination-related posts that suggest a potential associated SSTI were almost identical, with overlapping CIs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As such, we used advanced informatics methods on large amounts of social media data over 5 years to detect rare signals not easily identifiable in clinical studies. [27][28][29] Our methods identified a few reports of possible SSTIs from AIT and influenza vaccine, data that support that both procedures pose no meaningful infection risk. The frequency with which we observed AIT-related posts that suggest a potential associated SSTI and the frequency with which we identified influenza vaccination-related posts that suggest a potential associated SSTI were almost identical, with overlapping CIs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Taking into account the potential data richness of social media, especially in areas that are not necessarily covered through spontaneous reporting, Harpaz et al [ 63 ] have highlighted the potential of social media for public health monitoring due to the availability of large amounts of data that are “internet-based, patient-generated, unsolicited, and up-to-date” [ 63 ]. As stated by Curtis et al [ 64 ], there are many examples where social media have been studied for a variety of health conditions, including cancer [ 65 , 66 ], diabetes [ 67 , 68 ] and obesity [ 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are the evaluation of patterns of the usage of medicines, including the potential for off-label use, lack of efficacy or use of medicines during pregnancy, to measure the effectiveness of risk management measures or to perform health outcome assessments. Curtis et al [ 64 ] studied the use of data gathered from social media to complement traditional data sources to answer questions regarding comparative effectiveness and safety. To do this, they analysed publicly available social media data including Facebook, blogs and discussion boards for posts mentioning inflammatory arthritis (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Curtis et al used NLP to analyze social media data for posts mentioning inflammatory arthritis. In their study, all symptom information was manually extracted and then analyzed using disproportionality methods 42 . These methods are used to identify statistical associations between products, in this case medications, and specific events according to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%