2019
DOI: 10.1142/s0219622019500305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Media Cross-Source and Cross-Domain Sentiment Classification

Abstract: Due to the expansion of Internet and Web 2.0 phenomenon, there is a growing interest in sentiment analysis of freely opinionated text. In this paper, we propose a novel cross-source cross-domain sentiment classification, in which cross-domain-labeled Web sources (Amazon and Tripadvisor) are used to train supervised learning models (including two deep learning algorithms) that are tested on typically nonlabeled social media reviews (Facebook and Twitter). We explored a three-step methodology, in which distinct … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last few years, a wide range of scientific research has aimed to study the large amount of new data generated by internet users. Some applications have already been made in order to evaluate the sentiments of people related to any topic (Estévez‐Ortiz, García‐Jiménez, & Glösekötter, ; Zola, Cortez, Ragno, & Brentari, ) and to measure the outcomes of different disclosure strategies (Castelló, Etter, & Årup Nielsen, ; Colleoni, ; Etter et al, ). In this paper, we suggest the use of social media data and sentiment analysis to study the interactions on FB between stakeholders and PUs regarding environmental disclosure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, a wide range of scientific research has aimed to study the large amount of new data generated by internet users. Some applications have already been made in order to evaluate the sentiments of people related to any topic (Estévez‐Ortiz, García‐Jiménez, & Glösekötter, ; Zola, Cortez, Ragno, & Brentari, ) and to measure the outcomes of different disclosure strategies (Castelló, Etter, & Årup Nielsen, ; Colleoni, ; Etter et al, ). In this paper, we suggest the use of social media data and sentiment analysis to study the interactions on FB between stakeholders and PUs regarding environmental disclosure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the related research of user's reviews, a sentiment classification of movie reviews has been handled by Ahuja et al [16] using dual training and dual prediction while addressing polarity shift. Consequently, Zola et al [17] have propose a novel sentiment classification, in which a three-step methodology is explored based on balanced training, text preprocessing and machine learning using two languages: English and Italian.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, most supervised learning studies used binary labels, while we approach two training setups: one-class (unary), in which only positive financial texts are available; and two-class (binary), which assumes an access to both positive (financial) and negative (non financial) messages. Since Twitter texts are unlabeled, and in order to avoid a laborious manual effort, we use public and freely available news titles to set the positive and negative messages, thus making use of a transfer learning [22,39]. As for the TFD models, we adjust and compare several data preprocessing, statistical measures and ML algorithms, including recent Word2Vec encoding and deep learning methods (e.g., siamese autoencoder, deep multilayer perceptron).…”
Section: Twitter Financial Disambiguationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to get labeled data for train the models, we use easy to collect and freely available news titles (as detailed in Section 4.1). Given the samples of P and N , the TFD models use a transfer learning [22,39], where the models are adjusted to one training source (news titles) and tested on a different source (Twitter).…”
Section: Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation