2020
DOI: 10.1108/jkm-04-2020-0252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social media as a tool of knowledge sharing in academia: an empirical study using valance, instrumentality and expectancy (VIE) approach

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand the factors that determine the knowledge exchange intention and behavioural nature of academics by the help of social media tools in the Indian higher education. Design/methodology/approach This study has used valance–instrumentality–expectancy (VIE) theory to determine the knowledge exchange behaviour of academics. The study has considered the effects of knowledge contributor (KC) and knowledge seeker (KS) as moderators. The model has been validated by usin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers on psychology subscribe that there exist inverted U-shape effects of PI on age, the specific age-range depending on the cultural dispositions of the areas under consideration (Sheshadri, 2015). Research reveals that the impacts of peers are related to age (Mangleburg et al, 2004;Rana et al, 2020). It is expected that due to collectivist culture, compared to individualistic culture, young individuals at BOP (where it is expected that collectivist culture prevails) (Prahalad, 2012) would exhibit greater reliance and trust toward information received from the peers.…”
Section: The Mediating Effects Of Digital Experience and Peersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers on psychology subscribe that there exist inverted U-shape effects of PI on age, the specific age-range depending on the cultural dispositions of the areas under consideration (Sheshadri, 2015). Research reveals that the impacts of peers are related to age (Mangleburg et al, 2004;Rana et al, 2020). It is expected that due to collectivist culture, compared to individualistic culture, young individuals at BOP (where it is expected that collectivist culture prevails) (Prahalad, 2012) would exhibit greater reliance and trust toward information received from the peers.…”
Section: The Mediating Effects Of Digital Experience and Peersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals assess benefits and costs when engaging in resource exchanges with others (Oparaocha, 2016). In the context of KM, knowledge is recognised as a resource of exchange (Chatterjee, 2020) involving intangible benefits, such as respect and career prospects and costs, such as the possible misuse of knowledge by recipients (Valio Dominguez Gonzalez and Fernando Martins, 2014). In this regard, the collaboration and communication characteristics of teamwork discussed above are likely to enhance the perceived social benefits of knowledge exchange while reducing the perceived costs involved, resulting in a series of knowledge exchanges between team members (Oparaocha, 2016).…”
Section: Motivational Antecedents For Employee Knowledge Management E...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen above, KC/KS behaviors in VCs are usually intertwined with each other (Choi et al, 2014;Sedighi et al, 2018;Chatterjee et al, 2020) and OE-self (e.g. expectation of making new friends or social ties for the future) positively influences people's KC/KS behaviors (Chiu et al, 2006;Hsu et al, 2007;Pan et al, 2015;Xiong et al, 2018;You and Hon, 2019;Ardichvili et al, 2003).…”
Section: Direct Effectsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…a KS activity) can activate other members' discussion (i.e. KC activities) and a contribution of knowledge to the community knowledge repository (Choi et al, 2014;Sedighi et al, 2018;Chatterjee et al, 2020). Thus, OE-others may be positively related to older adults' KS behaviors and to their KC activities.…”
Section: Direct Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%