“…For the most part, this is due to the structure and dynamics of Singaporean society, and its political arrangements, public policy traditions and strong systems of social control and clear support for or alternatively discouragement and sanctioning of different kinds of expression and voicessomething well established in the scholarly literature (Chua, 2017;George, 2000George, , 2017Lee, 2010Lee, , 2014, especially via various studies published in Media International Australia (most recently, Lee and Lee, 2019). In recent years, the Singapore government, following the dampened level of votes received by governing People's Action Party (PAP), that has ruled since the 1967, in the 2011 Election, and a more sceptical populace (Barr, 2016;Zhang, 2016), it has sought to extend consultation and formal 'listening' mechanisms to provide additional opportunities for citizens' voices. Furthermore, while there has been increased discussion of privacy with the rise of digital technologies and unprecedented expansion of data generation, collection and use, the legal and regulatory framework is relatively weak in relation to privacy rights taken-for-granted in many jurisdictions (Chesterman, 2012(Chesterman, , 2018, even in the wake of the European General Data Protection Directive (GDPR).…”