2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social media and colorectal cancer: A systematic review of available resources

Abstract: AimSocial media (SM) can provide information and medical knowledge to patients. Our aim was to review the literature and web-based content on SM that is used by Colorectal Cancer (CRC) patients, as well as surgeons’ interaction with SM.MethodStudies published between 2006 and 2016 were assessed. We also assessed the impact of several hashtags on Twitter with a freeware (Symplur).ResultsNine studies were included assessing Twitter (78%), Forums/Cancer-survivor networks (33%), and Facebook (22%). Aims included u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a trusted and recommended source of information, healthcare workers need to share information clearly and understandably, taking into account several issues such as culture, language, and others (van Mossel et al, 2014). Using social media to share information may give survivors more opportunity to communicate, increase understanding of their conditions (Pellino et al, 2017), and enhancing their health literacy (Aoki, Inoue, 2017). On the other hand, information from social media often lacks validation (Sajid, Shakir, Baig, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a trusted and recommended source of information, healthcare workers need to share information clearly and understandably, taking into account several issues such as culture, language, and others (van Mossel et al, 2014). Using social media to share information may give survivors more opportunity to communicate, increase understanding of their conditions (Pellino et al, 2017), and enhancing their health literacy (Aoki, Inoue, 2017). On the other hand, information from social media often lacks validation (Sajid, Shakir, Baig, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We administered the survey internationally as a reflection of growing exchange of information and support between individuals with CRC from different countries, largely due to rising popularity online communities and use of social media (e.g. Facebook groups, Instagram) [ 14 16 ]. Participants were eligible for the study if they: 1) were 18 years of age or older; 2) received a diagnosis of CRC; and 3) were able to complete the online health survey in English, French, Spanish, or Mandarin.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4)(5)(6) The most common social media platforms that feature in health are Facebook and Twitter (6) . These applications provide a platform for creating (7)(8)(9)(10) and engaging different communities (11,12) , improving information exchange and communication (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) and educating a wide-range of users. (9,(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) Twitter is a microblogging platform that helps capture and share bite-sized pieces of information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%