1975
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1975.tb00907.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Learning of Vocal Patterns and Modes of their Application in Grey Parrots (Psittacus erithacus)1,2,3

Abstract: We have developed a method which allowed us to teach Grey Parrots special vocal patterns with a good success. The birds uttered these in antiphonal duets (Fig. 1, Table 1). The duets were performed only between the parrot and its cooperative partner. By experimental auditory stimulation we investigated the conditions of the vocal communication (Fig. 2, Fig. 3). Furthermore we found, that the performance of antiphonal duets obstructed the extension of the vocal repertoire with patterns which could not be learne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the more immediate conceptual needs is for a taxonomy of the kinds and degrees of social influence identified. Social influence ranges from the effects of song stimulation presented by tape recording to the effects of live, interacting tutors, which may be the student's father, sibling, mother, neighbor, consort, or rival (Baptista & Petrinovich, 1984Eales, 1985Eales, , 1987Marler, Dufty, & Pickert, 1986;Marler et aI., 1972;Payne, 1981Payne, , 1982Pep perberg, 1985;Price, 1979;Todt, 1975;Todt, Hultsch, & Heike, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the more immediate conceptual needs is for a taxonomy of the kinds and degrees of social influence identified. Social influence ranges from the effects of song stimulation presented by tape recording to the effects of live, interacting tutors, which may be the student's father, sibling, mother, neighbor, consort, or rival (Baptista & Petrinovich, 1984Eales, 1985Eales, , 1987Marler, Dufty, & Pickert, 1986;Marler et aI., 1972;Payne, 1981Payne, , 1982Pep perberg, 1985;Price, 1979;Todt, 1975;Todt, Hultsch, & Heike, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this as a reference, a classical but often neglected hypothesis may be of interest. It refers to the song learning of birds and assumes that this accomplishment reflects a strategy which prepares a young male for the contests he might have to face later in life (Todt 1975(Todt , 1981. In other words, a young male will benefit from a song memory which contains information about any song pattern a possible rival can sing It seems that this advantage also plays a role in the vocal imitation learning of parrots (Pepperberg 1999).…”
Section: Large Song Repertoiresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cetaceans and bats (Boughman 1997, Janik andSlater 1997), and for songbirds and a few other avian taxa, namely parrots (Todt 1975, Pepperberg 1999) and hummingbirds Schuchmann 1990, Jarvis et al 2000). With the exception of birds, systematic studies on this issue are rare (review in Hultsch and Todt 2004a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our primary system, called the model/rival, or M/R, approach, is based on a protocol developed by Todt (1975), which in turn derives much from Bandura (1971) and Mowrer (1960). In this procedure, humans demonstrate to the parrot the types of interactive responses desired.…”
Section: Training Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…", and is then required to formulate a vocal English response. Trials are conducted by secondary trainers hired exclusively for that task to lessen the possibility of cuing (Pepperberg, 1981), and to keep the bird from applying its knowledge to maintain a bond with the principal trainer to the exclusion of other humans (Mowrer, 19S2;Todt, 1975). The principal trainer is present, but sits in a corner of the room, does not look at the bird during the presentation of the test object, and therefore does not know what is being presented.…”
Section: Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%