2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0803-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social learning by imitation in a reptile (Pogona vitticeps)

Abstract: The ability to learn through imitation is thought to be the basis of cultural transmission 10 and was long considered a distinctive characteristic of humans. There is now evidence 11 that both mammals and birds are capable of imitation. However nothing is known about 12 these abilities in the third amniotic class -reptiles. Here we use a bidirectional control 13 procedure to show that a reptile species, the bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps), is 14 capable of social learning that cannot be explained by simple m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many animals engage in social learning (see Galef & Laland, 2005), including chimpanzees (e.g., Bering, Bjorklund, & Ragan, 2000;Whiten, 1998;Yamamoto, Humley, & Tanaka, 2013), orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus; Bering et al, 2000), capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella; Ottoni & Mannu, 2001), and other social mammals, as well as birds, such as ravens (Bugnyar & Kotrschal, 2002), quail (Köksal & Domjan, 1998), and chickens (Nicol, 2006), and fish (e.g., nine-spined sticklebacks, Pungitius pungitius; Kendal, Rendell, Pike, & Laland, 2009), and reptiles (bearded dragon, Pogona vitticeps; Kis, Huber, & Wilkinson, 2015).…”
Section: Social Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many animals engage in social learning (see Galef & Laland, 2005), including chimpanzees (e.g., Bering, Bjorklund, & Ragan, 2000;Whiten, 1998;Yamamoto, Humley, & Tanaka, 2013), orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus; Bering et al, 2000), capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella; Ottoni & Mannu, 2001), and other social mammals, as well as birds, such as ravens (Bugnyar & Kotrschal, 2002), quail (Köksal & Domjan, 1998), and chickens (Nicol, 2006), and fish (e.g., nine-spined sticklebacks, Pungitius pungitius; Kendal, Rendell, Pike, & Laland, 2009), and reptiles (bearded dragon, Pogona vitticeps; Kis, Huber, & Wilkinson, 2015).…”
Section: Social Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research investigating conspecific displays and species recognition (Clark, Macedonia, & Rosenthal, 1997;Macedonia & Stamps, 1994;Ord, Peters, Evans, & Taylor, 2002;Van Dyk & Evans, 2007;Yang, Phelps, Crews, & Wilczynski, 2001) has successfully used video stimuli in studies with lizards, focusing on videos of male conspecifics displaying an agonistic visual signal (head bobbing), although one study on social learning in bearded dragons has also shown that these animals are able to imitate female conspecifics seen in videos (Kis, Huber, & Wilkinson, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much previous research has been concerned with distinguishing different social learning mechanisms used by a number of species, and their respective requirement for models with agency, including humans (Huang and Charman, 2005; Flynn and Whiten, 2013), apes (Call et al, 2005; Tennie et al, 2006), monkeys (Bugnyar and Huber, 1997; Subiaul et al, 2004; Hopper et al, 2013), dogs (Miller et al, 2009; Lakatos et al, 2014), rats (Heyes et al, 1994; Zohar and Terkel, 1991), birds (Akins et al, 2002; Auersperg et al, 2014), and reptiles (Kis et al, in press). To distinguish emulative from imitative learning, two key controls that have been used are ‘end-state’ and ‘ghost display’ conditions (reviewed in Hopper, 2010), often in conjunction with ‘two-action’ or ‘bi-directional’ tasks (Akins and Zentall, 1996; Zentall, 1996; Klein and Zentall, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%