Social isolation and risk of heart disease and stroke: analysis of two large UK prospective studies

Abstract

Summary Background Social isolation has been associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease and stroke. However, it is unclear whether the associations differ between fatal and non-fatal events or by the type of isolation (living alone or having few social contacts). We aimed to examine these associations in two large UK prospective cohorts. Methods Million Women Study and UK Biobank participants without previous coronary heart disease or stroke who provided data in median year 2010 (IQR 2009–2011) on social contacts were included in this prospective analysis. Participants were followed up to median year 2017 (2017–2017) by electronic linkage to national hospital and death records. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using Cox regression for first coronary heart disease and stroke event (overall, and separately for hospital admission as the first event and for death without an associated hospital admission as the first event) by three levels of social isolation (based on living alone, contact with family or friends, and group participation) adjusted for age, sex, study, region, deprivation, smoking, alcohol intake, body-mass index, physical activity, and self-rated health. Findings 938 558 participants were included in our analyses (mean age 63 years [SD 9]): 481 946 participants from the Million Women Study (mean age 68 years [5]) and 456 612 participants (mean age 57 years [8]) from UK Biobank. During a mean follow-up period of 7 years (2), 42 402 first coronary heart disease events (of which 1834 were fatal without an associated hospital admission) and 19 999 first stroke events (of which 529 were fatal without an associated hospital admission) occurred. Little, if any, association was found between social isolation and hospital admission for a first coronary heart disease or stroke event (combined RR for both studies 1·01 [95% CI 0·98–1·04] for coronary heart disease and 1·13 [1·08–1·18] for stroke, when comparing the most isolated group with the least isolated group). However, the risk of death without an associated hospital admission was substantially higher in the most isolated group than the least isolated group for coronary heart disease (1·86 [1·63–2·12]) and stroke (1·91 [1·48–2·46]). For coronary heart disease or stroke death as the first event, RRs were substantially higher (test for heterogeneity, p=0·002) for participants living alone versus those not living alone (1·60 [1·46–1·75]) than for those with fewer versus more contact with family, friends, or groups (1·27 [1·16–1·38]). These findings did not differ greatly between studies, or by self-rated health. Interpretation Social isolation seems to have little direct effect on the risk of developing a first coronary heart disease or stroke. By contrast, social isolation substantially increases the risk that the first such event is fatal before reaching hospital, particularly among people who live alone, perhaps because of the a...

Associations of face-to-face and non-face-to-face social isolation with all-cause and cause-specific mortality: 13-year follow-up of the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort study

“…We found the education did not modify the associations of social isolation with mortality, which was not consistent with previous studies showing the mortality risk of social isolation change depend upon SEP but without clarifying the types of social contact [ 27 , 59 , 60 ]. Moreover, living alone was particularly increased the CVD mortality in unhealthy participants suggesting the importance of immediate help among people who live alone, as a recent study reported [ 3 ].…”

“…For example, the UK Biobank study [ 32 ] assessed social isolation using a social isolation index, which only included questions on face-to-face contact. The Million Women Study [ 3 ] and English Longitudinal Study of Ageing [ 54 ] included results of a composite score with e-mail, phone and face-to-face contact but did not report results on different isolation types. The Whitehall II Study [ 55 ], the Nurses’ Health Study [ 56 ], and the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study [ 24 ] also showed a higher mortality risk related to social isolation but did not specify the types of contact.…”

“…Social isolation is defined as “a state in which the individual lacks a sense of belonging socially, lacks engagement with others, has a minimal number of social contact and they are deficient in fulfilling and quality relationships” [ 1 , 2 ]. It has been shown to be associated with higher risks of heart disease and stroke [ 3 ], dementia [ 4 ], and mortality [ 5 ]. Though the adverse effect on mortality was comparable to or greater than some well-established risk factors [ 6 , 7 ], it has received less attention [ 8 ].…”

Loneliness among older adults in Europe: The relative importance of early and later life conditions

“…Loneliness has been a growing topic of interest in Europe over the last decade [ 1 – 4 ], as it has been shown to be linked with ill health and to increase with age. Loneliness is correlated with a higher risk of developing mental conditions (e.g., depression, dementia) and a deterioration in physical health (e.g., less active lifestyles, diabetes, stroke, coronary heart disease), as shown for instance in [ 5 – 11 ]. Loneliness is also linked with all causes of mortality [ 12 – 15 ] and has an impact on health care utilization [ 16 ].…”

Social isolation transitions and psychological distress among older adults in rural China: A longitudinal study before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…Based on the previous research ( Guo et al, 2021 ; Smith et al, 2021 ), the social isolation index used in our study was constructed from three questions: 1) Including yourself, how many people are living together in your household (1 point was given for living alone); 2) how often do you contact (e.g. phone, meet, email) family members (1 point was given for answering about rarely or never, monthly, or no family outside household); 3) which of the following (e.g.…”