1951
DOI: 10.2307/2087514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Isolation and Response of Farmers to Agricultural Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We think that the image of an individual's networks made by few strong ties and several weak ties does not fully capture the multiple social contexts we live in and therefore a new concept and measure of isolation is needed. As we elaborate below, our approach is based on combining two perspectives on isolation-one that considers structural characteristics of individual networks and another that considers subjective feelings (see for example, Wilkening 1951 for the effects of social isolation on policy adoption). The underlying assumption is that social ties are important because they generate meaning for the two people that share a connection (White 1995a, White 1995b and that keeping disparate meanings together, i.e., ties from diverse social contexts, can create a dissonance (Bearman & Moody 2004) that produces feelings of loneliness.…”
Section: A Question For Our Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We think that the image of an individual's networks made by few strong ties and several weak ties does not fully capture the multiple social contexts we live in and therefore a new concept and measure of isolation is needed. As we elaborate below, our approach is based on combining two perspectives on isolation-one that considers structural characteristics of individual networks and another that considers subjective feelings (see for example, Wilkening 1951 for the effects of social isolation on policy adoption). The underlying assumption is that social ties are important because they generate meaning for the two people that share a connection (White 1995a, White 1995b and that keeping disparate meanings together, i.e., ties from diverse social contexts, can create a dissonance (Bearman & Moody 2004) that produces feelings of loneliness.…”
Section: A Question For Our Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6. Adoption categories based on Rogers' definitions Sources: Lionberger, 1954;Rogers, 1958;Rogers and Beal, 1958;Ryan, 1948;Ryan andGross, 1943, 1950;Wilkening, 1950Wilkening, , 1951Wilkening, , 1952 Ethnocentrism and collectivism are found to be negative influences on the innovativeness of the individual, regardless of his/her personality and psychological characteristics. Social influence on an individual is so comprehensive that it is not just additional value in an individual desire-set, but rather, it pushes the desire-set of the individual towards a preference for more traditional motivations conforming to existing social values (Steenkamp, ter Hofstede, & Wedel, 1999).…”
Section: The Social Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%