2018
DOI: 10.1177/2043610618763177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Social investment’ as political economy of education: Recent changes in early childhood education in New Zealand

Abstract: The newly coined policy of social investment is an economic argument for targeting state investment to the most needy. I use Foucault's notion of biopolitics in a discursive analysis of recent New Zealand policy documents pertaining to a discrete group of 'vulnerable children'. I further argue that the Foucauldian metaphor of state institutions as warlike gives knowledge/ power to investment as efficient government.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Support needed includes government policy and financial support from private sectors. Unlike their counterparts in some developed countries like Japan, the United States, New Zealand, and the countries of Western Europe (Lee, 2010; Cheadle, 2008; Stuart, 2018; Busemeyer et al, 2018), for many Indonesian parents social participation in schooling activities is difficult due to their low economic status. Similar to cases in other developing countries including Ethiopia, Egypt and Pakistan (Nassar & Biltagy, 2017; Woldehanna, 2016; Hunzai, 2006), public investment in education, which includes parental participation, is still low in Indonesia.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Support needed includes government policy and financial support from private sectors. Unlike their counterparts in some developed countries like Japan, the United States, New Zealand, and the countries of Western Europe (Lee, 2010; Cheadle, 2008; Stuart, 2018; Busemeyer et al, 2018), for many Indonesian parents social participation in schooling activities is difficult due to their low economic status. Similar to cases in other developing countries including Ethiopia, Egypt and Pakistan (Nassar & Biltagy, 2017; Woldehanna, 2016; Hunzai, 2006), public investment in education, which includes parental participation, is still low in Indonesia.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the importance of education as future investment, most parents attempt to provide the best for their children, striving to invest in their children’s education. This future investment in education may not pose problems for high economic status parents living in developed countries such as Japan (Lee, 2010), the United States (Cheadle, 2008), New Zealand (Stuart, 2018), and countries of Western Europe (Busemeyer, Garritzmann, Neimanns, & Nezi, 2018). It may, however, be more challenging for parents from underdeveloped and developing countries such as Ethiopia, Egypt and Pakistan, where poverty and limited public participation still serve as challenges for educational investment (Nassar & Biltagy, 2017; Woldehanna, 2016; Hunzai, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been well documented that geographies going through neoliberalisation used children both as cheap labour and future labour (LeBaron and Ayers, 2013). This is the precise reason we see claim-makers advocating reformation of educational system to scaffold social and emotional abilities of children in order to prepare them for the new industrial revolution (Stuart, 2018; TUSIAD, 2019).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Playcentre and Te Kohanga Reo -two parent-led services endemic to Aotearoa New Zealand -have been profoundly influential on the foundations of the early childhood sector and its curriculum, Te Whāriki (May, 2009). However, their reliance on parents as volunteers has run counter to policy foregrounding parental participation in the national workforce (see for example, Early Childhood Education Taskforce, 2011), thus leaving the early childhood sector to be strongly influenced by the twin policy drivers of expanding the labour market, especially drawing in working mothers, and the market-driven model of provision (Mitchell, 2017;Stuart, 2018).…”
Section: Assessment Understood In the Context Of Marginalisation Of Pmentioning
confidence: 99%