Social Interactions in Zoo-Housed Elephants: Factors Affecting Social Relationships

Abstract

Simple SummaryIn the wild, elephants live in large, complex social groups. Herds consist of a mixed structure of related females and their calves. One area of concern regarding the maintenance of zoo elephants has been the inability to provide them with social groupings that reflect wild group structure, and whether this impacts on their welfare. Here, we investigated whether a number of factors at the individual (e.g., personality, age or relatedness to others) and zoo (e.g., herd size, presence of calves in the group) level affected the frequency of social interactions in zoo elephant herds. Interactions were defined as positive or negative and then subdivided into physical and non-physical interactions. Social interactions were found to be related to age, personality, presence of calves in the herd, relatedness to other elephants in the herd and species (African or Asian). Calves engaged in the greatest amount of positive interactions but no extreme aggression was observed between any individuals, which was considered indicative of good social management. Increasing understanding about social structures that are affecting elephant relationships enables targeted management plans to be created, in order to provide elephants with the most appropriate social environments. These findings support the recommendations that elephants should be housed in related herds with multiple ages wherever possible, but they also highlight that unrelated elephants can still form compatible and successful social groups.AbstractElephants have complex social systems that are predominantly driven by ecological factors in situ. Within zoos, elephants are held in relatively static social groups and the factors observed driving social relationships in the wild are largely absent. Little research has investigated the effect of social group factors in zoos on elephant social interactions. The aim of this research was to establish whether there is a relationship between social group factors and social behaviour, in order to identify factors that make elephant herds more or less likely to be compatible. Results will facilitate recommendations for optimum social groupings for zoo elephants. Behavioural data quantifying social interactions were collected between January 2016 and February 2017 at seven UK and Irish zoos and safari parks from 10 African and 22 Asian elephants. Social interactions were split into four categories: positive physical, positive non-physical, negative physical and negative non-physical. Social interactions were related to age (positive physical higher and negative non-physical lower in calves than adults), personality (elephants with higher sociability scores engaged in more positive interactions and less negative interactions), presence of calves in the herd (herds with calves had more positive non-physical), relatedness to other elephants in the herd (positive non-physical were higher when relatives were in the group and negative non-physical were higher between unrelated elephants) and species (Asian elephants engag...

Welfare Assessment and Activities of Captive Elephants in Thailand

“…Based on our survey [ 6 ], newer camps are moving away from scheduled, primarily solitary activities to allowing more free time for elephants to interact and play, especially around bath time. More opportunities to socialize can result in better breeding success, with added welfare benefits associated with motherhood [ 74 ]. In the wild, elephants live in matriarchal societies, although Asian elephants show noticeably less social connectivity at the population level compared to Africans [ 75 ].…”

A preliminary study of mirror-induced self-directed behaviour on wildlife at the Royal Belum Rainforest Malaysia

“…These factors allow for adaptability between the groups of elephants that would influence the behavioural response to the mirror image in close proximity. In addition, the elephants in the wild are quick to respond with the enrichments or objects such as mirror and camera trap that would contribute a strangest or unfamiliar to them 7 , 15 , 35 . In fact, numerous images captured in this study showed that elephants are furiously inspecting the camera traps.…”

Koi (Cyprinus rubrofuscus) Seek Out Tactile Interaction with Humans: General Patterns and Individual Differences

“…First, provided that the patterns are found to be relatively stable over time, they can serve as a baseline by which to evaluate individual welfare. Recognizing and tracking patterns of individual behavior is a useful tool in measuring welfare in zoo housed animals [ 101 , 102 , 103 ], with significant changes in individual and/or group behavioral dynamics considered to pose a potential welfare threat. While this approach is appropriate for certain conditions (such as poor water quality), it may not be sufficient in detecting subtle signs of early disease, many of which are critical to identify early in order to prevent major losses [ 104 ].…”