2005
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social interaction with non-averse group-mates modifies a learned food aversion in single- and mixed-species groups of tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis andS. labiatus)

Abstract: For social species, being a member of a cohesive group and performing activities as a coordinated unit appear to provide a mechanism for the efficient transmission of information about food. Social learning about food palatability was investigated in two captive primates, Saguinus fuscicollis and S. labiatus, which form stable and cohesive mixed-species groups in the wild. We explored whether an induced food aversion toward a preferred food is modified during and after social interaction with non-averse conspe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social factors affect response to food; in young common marmosets they may increase acceptance of novel food [Vitale & Queyras, 1997;Voelkl et al, 2006;Yamamoto & Lopes, 2004] and are powerful in reversing an acquired food aversion [Queyras et al, 2000; see also Prescott et al, 2005 for similar results in Saguinus fuscicollis and S. labiatus]. Similarly, tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) eat more of a novel food when they see group members eating than when they are alone [Addessi & Visalberghi, 2006;Visalberghi & Addessi, 2003 for a review].…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Social factors affect response to food; in young common marmosets they may increase acceptance of novel food [Vitale & Queyras, 1997;Voelkl et al, 2006;Yamamoto & Lopes, 2004] and are powerful in reversing an acquired food aversion [Queyras et al, 2000; see also Prescott et al, 2005 for similar results in Saguinus fuscicollis and S. labiatus]. Similarly, tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) eat more of a novel food when they see group members eating than when they are alone [Addessi & Visalberghi, 2006;Visalberghi & Addessi, 2003 for a review].…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These preferences are innate in animals as well as in humans and might have had a role in human evolution to detect plant poisonous substances (5). Nevertheless, social factors may lead to conditioned learning preference for bitter foods, as happened with coffee and some bitter vegetables (6,7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food palatability is generally assessed in humans with the use of psychometric methods that are based on the tasting of food and self-recording of a score for food pleasantness on hedonic visual analog scales (VASs) 6 or fixed-point scales (8). The cephalic phase response to eating can be efficiently investigated by using a modified sham feeding (MSF) protocol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support of this, research has examined socially biased learning in primate taxa, such as Callitrichidae, which are typified by relatively egalitarian social networks that might otherwise not receive attention based on their phylogenetic status (e.g. cottontop tamarins, Saguinus oedipus [Moscovice & Snowdon, 2006;Snowdon & Boe, 2003]; common marmosets, C. jacchus [Caldwell & Whiten, 2004;Voelkl & Huber, 2000]; golden lion tamarins, Leontopithecus rosalia [Stoinski & Beck, 2001]; saddle-back tamarin, S. fuscicollis, and redbellied tamarin, S. labiatus [Prescott & Buchanan-Smith, 1999;Prescott et al, 2005]. Indeed, this family has multiple characteristics that make it ideal for studying socially biased learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%