2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2022.101948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social interaction and negotiation outcomes: An experimental approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Negotiators who trust each other exchange more information about priorities and preferences, and therefore reach more integrative outcomes (e.g., Butler, 1995;Kimel et al, 1980;Weingart et al, 1993). However, it has also been shown that excessive candor and trust by a negotiator can result in greater concession-making, and poorer outcomes for him/her (Lewicky and Polin, 2013;DeRue et al, 2009) and that trust cannot be easily generated with the purpose of improving a negotiation outcome (Brañas-Garza et al, 2023).…”
Section: Related Literature and Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negotiators who trust each other exchange more information about priorities and preferences, and therefore reach more integrative outcomes (e.g., Butler, 1995;Kimel et al, 1980;Weingart et al, 1993). However, it has also been shown that excessive candor and trust by a negotiator can result in greater concession-making, and poorer outcomes for him/her (Lewicky and Polin, 2013;DeRue et al, 2009) and that trust cannot be easily generated with the purpose of improving a negotiation outcome (Brañas-Garza et al, 2023).…”
Section: Related Literature and Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%