Social Integration of Artificial Intelligence: Functions, Automation Allocation Logic and Human-Autonomy Trust

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is finding more uses in the human society resulting in a need to scrutinise the relationship between humans and AI. Technology itself has advanced from the mere encoding of human knowledge into a machine to designing machines that "know how" to autonomously acquire the knowledge they need, learn from it and act independently in the environment. Fortunately, this need is not new; it has scientific grounds that could be traced back to the inception of computers. This paper uses a multidisciplinary lens to explore how the natural cognitive intelligence in a human could interface with the artificial cognitive intelligence of a machine. The scientific journey over the last 50 years will be examined to understand the Human-AI relationship, and to present the nature of, and the role of trust in, this relationship. Risks and opportunities sitting at the human-AI interface will be studied to reveal some of the fundamental technical challenges for a trustworthy human-AI relationship. The critical assessment of the literature leads to the conclusion that any social integration of AI into the human social system would necessitate a form of a relationship on one level or another in society, meaning that humans will "always" actively participate in certain decision-making loops-either in-the-loop or on-the-loop-that will influence the operations of AI, regardless of how sophisticated it is.

Explainable Automated Essay Scoring: Deep Learning Really Has Pedagogical Value

“…Rubric scores were resolved by adding the rubric scores assigned by the two human raters, producing a resolved rubric score between 0 and 6. This paper is a continuation of Boulanger and Kumar (2018, 2019 and Kumar and Boulanger (2020) where the objective is to open the AES black box to explain the holistic and rubric scores that it predicts. Essentially, the holistic score Kumar, 2018, 2019) is determined and justified through its four rubrics.…”

The Introduction of AI in the Construction Industry and Its Impact on Human Behavior

“…Traditional culture classifies humans and technology as separate entities (Carpenter et al 2018). However, the last years technological development have resulted in advanced automation that can respond better than a human in specific situations (Abbass 2019). Humans can't compete with AI regarding analysis of data, information and knowledge, likewise AI cannot compete with a human's ability of pedagogy, creativity, visions and ethics (Carpenter et al 2018).…”

“…Trust blend a complex array of interactions factors including attitude, beliefs, control, emotion, risk and power (Abbass 2019). Stated that AI do not have attitude, beliefs or emotion in addition to the human lack of understanding, may cause it hard for a human to trust the output.…”

“…However, if vulnerability is defined as f (capability, opportunity, intent), and one assume that the AI's intent is aligned with the human's intent, humans can through training learn AI's capabilities and opportunities. In other words, it is possible to increase the transparency, and further the trust, by educating humans about what AI can and cannot do, and where disruption might occur (Abbass 2019).…”

Hybrid Teamwork: Consideration of Teamwork Concepts to Reach Naturalistic Interaction between Humans and Conversational Agents

“…insights and predictions), which rely on vast amounts of data and thereby qualify as criteria for human workers' decision making [1]. Moreover, teamwork between humans and machines will entail and allow the delegation and allocation of (sub-)tasks to one another [5,6].…”