2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11236767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Innovation for Sustainability: The Case of Oil Producing Communities in the Niger Delta region

Abstract: This study demonstrates how social innovation may engender development as well as peace in deep-rooted poverty and conflict regions in the Niger Delta context. By means of a qualitative study involving oil producing communities in the Niger Delta, this study identifies the dynamics, relevant actors and factors that foster social innovation, creating particular socio-economic outcomes, and contributes to the role of institutions in this context. Our findings suggest that active stakeholders’ engagement, facilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
2
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Worthy of mention is the fact that findings in this study also indicate that the activities of youth militancy within communities of the Niger Delta region of Nigeria have recorded significant adverse effects on the successes made by Chevron and SPDC in the area of project execution and development of host communities in the area. This position is in line with the arguments of prior studies (Ogbemi & Imide, 2008;Idemudia, 2014;Amabipi, 2016;Ismail, Ilu & Galadima, 2018;Omobhude & Chen, 2019;Ogbemi, 2020;Gbali, Weli & Mmom, 2021) who have at different times reiterated that the developmental initiatives of oil companies within the region of Niger-Delta have been marred by the negative consequences of the activities of youth militia in the area. In line with the above positions, Hypothesis I of this study was tested and the result in Table 4.4 summarizes the outcome regarding the effect which the level of awareness and knowledge of Chevron Regional Development Councils (RDCs) and Shell Cluster Development Boards (CDBs) may have on the participation in projects by different social strata within host communities of oil companies in Nigeria.…”
Section: Test Of Hypotheses II Ho2supporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Worthy of mention is the fact that findings in this study also indicate that the activities of youth militancy within communities of the Niger Delta region of Nigeria have recorded significant adverse effects on the successes made by Chevron and SPDC in the area of project execution and development of host communities in the area. This position is in line with the arguments of prior studies (Ogbemi & Imide, 2008;Idemudia, 2014;Amabipi, 2016;Ismail, Ilu & Galadima, 2018;Omobhude & Chen, 2019;Ogbemi, 2020;Gbali, Weli & Mmom, 2021) who have at different times reiterated that the developmental initiatives of oil companies within the region of Niger-Delta have been marred by the negative consequences of the activities of youth militia in the area. In line with the above positions, Hypothesis I of this study was tested and the result in Table 4.4 summarizes the outcome regarding the effect which the level of awareness and knowledge of Chevron Regional Development Councils (RDCs) and Shell Cluster Development Boards (CDBs) may have on the participation in projects by different social strata within host communities of oil companies in Nigeria.…”
Section: Test Of Hypotheses II Ho2supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Notwithstanding the poor turnout and/or low level of participation by residents of host communities, it was however observed that the general view of the majority of the respondents is that the decisions made by Chevron and SPDC on the nature and type of projects to be executed and/or executed through RDCs and CDBs respectively were largely influenced by governments and their respective officials. The above findings are not significantly different from the conclusions of prior research (Idemudia, 2007;Idemudia, 2014;Amabipi, 2016;Omobhude & Chen, 2019).…”
Section: Test Of Hypotheses II Ho2contrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Notwithstanding the poor turnout and/or low level of participation by residents of host communities, it was however observed that the general view of the majority of the respondents is that the decisions made by Chevron and SPDC on the nature and type of projects to be executed and/or executed through RDCs and CDBs respectively were largely influenced by governments and their respective officials. The above findings are not significantly different from the conclusions of prior research (Idemudia, 2007;Idemudia, 2014;Amabipi, 2016;Omobhude & Chen, 2019).…”
Section: Test Of Hypotheses II Ho2contrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Despite referring foremost to advanced economies and to the EU institutional context, this LPS transition framework might be adapted and expanded to contexts and case studies in new industrialized and developing economies [43,59,60,65], also considering initial states of generally low degrees in local drivers. In those regions and countries, the local trade-offs between smart goals and the other goals of sustainability might be more extreme, describing transition paths whose positive outcomes depend on narrower sets of place-based and upper-level-specific conditions.…”
Section: Conclusion and A Look Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%