Social inequalities and prevalence of depressive symptoms: a cross-sectional study of women in a Mexican border city, 2014

Abstract

Objective. To assess the association between intersectional disadvantage and clinically significant depressive symptoms (CSDS), describing the magnitude of social inequalities in the prevalence of symptoms among adult women in Tijuana, Mexico. Methods. This was a cross-sectional study. CSDS were assessed using the Centers for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale among a probability sample of 2 345 women from 18 – 65 years of age in 2014. CSDS prevalence was calculated according to categories of three social stratifiers: socioeconomic status (SES), educational attainment, and fertility (number of children). Social inequality was measured with the slope index of inequality (SII) and the concentration index (CIx). Intersectionality among stratifiers was explored descriptively and with multivariable regression analysis. Results. CSDS prevalence was 17.7% (95%CI: 15.1% – 21.0%). The SII and CIx showed inequity in all social stratifiers. The absolute difference in CSDS prevalence between the lowest and highest ends of the SES gradient was 21.9% (95%CI: 21.5% – 22.4%). Among the most disadvantaged women, i.e., those at the intersection of lowest SES, lowest educational attainment, and highest fertility, the CSDS prevalence was 39.5% (95% CI: 26.0% – 52.9%). Conclusions. Disadvantage along multiple axes was associated with CSDS. Efforts to improve the mental health of women should include equity-oriented policies that address its social determinants.

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Depression in Older Adults in Tabriz, Iran: Data from the Health Status of Aged People in Tabriz (HSA-T Study)

“…32 This discrepancy is most likely due to the numerous potentially confounding social and economic factors. 33 Therefore, the gender difference found in the prevalence of depression in the current study might be due to social constraints, prejudices, and stereotyped beliefs about women in Iran. Nevertheless, there is no clear evidence that the prevalence of depressive disorders is higher in countries where women have a lower status than men compared with countries where women are more equal.…”

COVID-19 and the Nordic Paradox: a call to measure the inequality reducing benefits of welfare systems in the wake of the pandemic

“…These deleterious social consequences have been experienced more sharply among women, even in the highest-income settings, due to their overrepresentation in certain industries, and because women are more likely to work temporary jobs which have fewer legal protections ( ILO Monitor ; Bambra et al, 2021 ). Further, these inequalities must be viewed intersectionally, as woman are often embedded in environments conferring multiple dimensions of disadvantage based on employment, fertility, migrant status, race/ethnicity, and educational background ( Crenshaw, 1991 ; Calderon-Villarreal et al, 2014 ).…”