Social individuation: Extending the scale of emotional development – Short (SED-S) for adolescent reference ages

Tarasova, Daria; Zepperitz, Sabine; Ronsse, E; Vonk, Jolanda; Zaal, Sandra; Hudson, Mark; Sappok, Tanja

doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104303

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The SED-S scale is the scale with most empirical evidence regarding its validity; therefore, we recommend this scale for scientific research (Flachsmeyer et al submitted;Meinecke et al submitted;Sappok et al 2016;Sappok et al 2019;Sappok et al 2020;Sterkenburg et al 2021). For clinical practice, it should be noted that like SEO-Lukas, items to assess stage 6 ED have been published recently for the SED-S (Tarasova et al 2022). Stage 6 items of the SED-S were phrased by a group of international scientists and differ from those of SEO-Lukas.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Brief report comparing the Scale of Emotional Development – Short (SED‐S) with other scales for emotional development

Sappok,

Morisse,

Flachsmeyer

et al. 2023

J intellect Disabil Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundDifferent instruments were devised for assessing emotional development (ED) level in persons with an intellectual disability (ID), that is, the Scale of Emotional Development – Short (SED‐S), the Scheme for Appraisal of Emotional Development (SAED), the Scale for Emotional Development – Second Revision (SED‐R2) and the Schaal voor Emotionele Ontwikkeling – Lukas (SEO‐Lukas). The aim of this study was to compare the level of emotional functioning as assessed with the SED‐S with the SAED, SED‐R2 and SEO‐Lukas.MethodsEmotional development was measured in adults with ID with the SED‐S (N = 186) and the SAED (n = 85), the SED‐R2 (n = 50) and the SEO‐Lukas (n = 51). Correlation analysis and Cohen's kappas were calculated between the SED‐S and the three respective scales. Internal consistencies (Cronbach's alpha) of the four scales were determined.ResultsThe SED‐S results correlated most with the SEO‐Lukas (γ = 1; кω = 0.936) followed by the SAED (γ = 0.809; кω = 0.343) and least by the SED‐R2 (γ = 0.665; кω = 0.182). The stage of ED assessed with the SED‐S was lower than the ED results measured with the SAED, but higher than with the SED‐R2 and most similar to the SEO‐Lukas. Cronbach's alphas were high, ranging from 0.853 to 0.975.ConclusionsGiven the respective differences between the scales, the SED‐S may equalise the results as compared with previous versions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For clinical practice, it should be noted that like SEO‐Lukas, items to assess stage 6 ED have been published recently for the SED‐S (Tarasova et al . 2022). Stage 6 items of the SED‐S were phrased by a group of international scientists and differ from those of SEO‐Lukas.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Brief report comparing the Scale of Emotional Development – Short (SED‐S) with other scales for emotional development

Sappok,

Morisse,

Flachsmeyer

et al. 2023

J intellect Disabil Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the fifth phase, from ages 8-12 years (Reality Awareness), moral development, logical thinking and self-differentiation further develop (Sappok et al 2022). Recently, a sixth phase, Social Individuation, has been added to the model for the ages between 13 and 17 years, in which identity formation, abstract thinking and self-reflection further differentiate (Tarasova et al 2022). For adults with a DID, especially for those who show challenging behaviours, the developmental perspective is crucial to understand the underlying emotional needs and to find more targeted treatment options to help maintain mental health and well-being (Sappok et al 2014(Sappok et al , 2021.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A brief version of the Scale of Emotional Development – Short

Sappok,

Barrett,

Lutter

2024

J intellect Disabil Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe Scale of Emotional Development – Short (SED‐S) captures the level of emotional development in persons with a disorder of intellectual development (DID) with 200 items on five developmental levels. The study aims to develop a brief version of the SED‐S.MethodsBased on item analysis (proportions, χ2‐test, Spearman's ρ and corrected item–total correlation), a brief version of the SED‐S was developed in a sample of 224 adults with a DID (n1) and validated in a second independent matched sample (n2 = 223).ResultsItem reliability ranged per item set from Cronbach's α = 0.835 to 0.924. Weighted kappa resulted in κω = 0.743 (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval = 0.690–0.802). Overall agreement of the brief version with the original SED‐S was PO = 0.7. The brief version of the SED‐S showed weaknesses in distinguishing level 2 from the adjacent levels.ConclusionsThe brief version of the SED‐S showed good reliability and moderate to good validity results. Items of phase 2 and, to some degree, of phase 5 should be revised to further improve the psychometric properties of the scale.

show abstract

Item‐validity analysis of the SED‐S in a multicentre study of adults with intellectual disabilities

Hermann,

Witte,

Kempelmann

et al. 2024

Research Intellect Disabil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundValid and reliable instruments for measuring emotional development are critical for a proper diagnostic assignment in individuals with intellectual disabilities. This exploratory study examined the psychometric properties of the items on the Scale of Emotional Development—Short (SED‐S).MethodThe sample included 612 adults with intellectual disabilities (Mage = 37.35, SDage = 13.27; 59.8% males). Item validity analysis comprising sensitivity and specificity rates and discriminatory power were determined.ResultsThe relative mean frequency of ‘yes’ answers to all 200 items was 29.5%. The mean sensitivity rate was 67.5% and the mean specificity rate was 79.3%. Most items (85.0%) showed good discriminatory power with the adjacent stage(s), especially between SED‐1, SED‐2, SED‐3 and SED‐4. Particularly in SED‐4 some items showed weaknesses in the differentiation between these stages.DiscussionThis study adds to previous validation studies by showing that most SED‐S items have psychometrically sound properties.

show abstract

Social individuation: Extending the scale of emotional development – Short (SED-S) for adolescent reference ages

Cited by 3 publications

References 42 publications

Brief report comparing the Scale of Emotional Development – Short (SED‐S) with other scales for emotional development

Brief report comparing the Scale of Emotional Development – Short (SED‐S) with other scales for emotional development

A brief version of the Scale of Emotional Development – Short

Item‐validity analysis of the SED‐S in a multicentre study of adults with intellectual disabilities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About