Social inclusion and the circular economy: The case of a fashion textiles manufacturer in Vietnam

Abstract

There has been significant growth in interest in the circular economy (“CE”) concept as a transformative solution to the prevailing linear economy, helping to solve various economic, environmental and social challenges. Nevertheless, pertinent issues such as societal inclusion, well‐being and equity remain peripheral in the contemporary CE debate. Fulfilling human needs has been recognised as a prerequisite for sustainable development and was implicitly and explicitly prevalent in parts of the seminal material on which the CE is based. However, the contemporary use of the concept by business has left it bereft of any convincing evidence that a CE will satisfy needs in a radically different way to the existing linear economy. As a result, there are few practical cases for business learning, and even fewer in a developing world context. This study explores a unique business venture implemented by a Vietnam‐based denim manufacturer, which simultaneously tackles two key development challenges: The inclusion of vulnerable communities and sustainable resource use. The venture employs persons with disabilities and utilises textile by‐products from the core production to produce a range of upcycled items (e.g., bags, cushion covers etc). This forms part of a broader company‐wide social sustainability and CE strategy. We utilise Max‐Neef's Human‐Scale Development proposal as a lens explore how the venture can support need satisfaction of these employees while being environmentally sustainable. We seek to provide a compelling practical case to illustrate how social impact and circularity can be simultaneously enhanced at the micro‐level.

Handling customer green pressures: The mediating role of process innovation among export‐oriented manufacturing industries

“…Therefore, learning new requirements from external partners such as customers, quickly aligning, absorbing, and applying these new processes, can significantly improve the environmental and business performances (Mothe et al, 2017). This business learning concept has been examined in a developing world context (Clube & Tennant, 2021) where export manufacturing strategy has been the main driver for economic development. The results from this study confirmed previous managerial suggestions: (1) implementing similar green vendor certification programs and (2) aligning to green activities with partner firms (Lee, 2019).…”

How can we build inclusive circular supply chains? Examining the case of agricultural residue usage in India

“…Question about how value is distributed in the novel chains and who benefits and who loses are important to ponder now, as we build novel processes (Friant et al 2020). Fair inclusion of diverse actors into circular business could enhance the positive impact of circularity to sustainable development (Kolk et al, 2014; Likoko & Kini, 2017; Prahalad, 2004; Rosca et al, 2019), yet aspects that may enable or hamper fair and effective inclusion of diverse actors remain a scarcely studied phenomenon (Aarikka‐Stenroos et al, 2021; Becerra et al, 2020; Clube & Tennant, 2022; Valencia et al, 2021).…”

How Is Fashion Going: Structured Literature Review for Circular Economy in Fashion and Textile Industry

“…They maximize the recycling of waste material from the production line and put it into the production of by-products, achieving a certain degree of circular economy shift within the company. (Clube and Tennant, 2022) [18] Although waste materials can be recycled and reused to a greater extent at the company level, at the industry level there are barriers to the implementation of the four steps of collection, sorting, recycling and reuse. In their book Towards a Nordic textile strategy: collection, sorting, reuse and recycling of textiles, David Palm et al provide an insight into the textile waste recycling systems in the Nordic countries.…”