2014
DOI: 10.1177/1476750314534455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social impact and the justification of action research knowledge

Abstract: Generalization in research takes the form of statements where knowledge is claimed to be valid for objects beyond those actually studied. Can action research knowledge, with its emphasis on cooperation between research and those concerned, apply this notion? Several action researchers seem to answer this question in the negative in the sense that they introduce specific measures to support the broad application of knowledge emanating from action research, such as locating projects within networks, working with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The main instrument in pursuing this goal is an ongoing Joint Action Program (HF-B). According to Gustavsen (2014), by 2010, approximately 2000 companies had used funding received from HF-B to arrange labor-management dialogue conferences or to launch research and development projects.…”
Section: Milestones In Norwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main instrument in pursuing this goal is an ongoing Joint Action Program (HF-B). According to Gustavsen (2014), by 2010, approximately 2000 companies had used funding received from HF-B to arrange labor-management dialogue conferences or to launch research and development projects.…”
Section: Milestones In Norwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem can be regarded as a major shortcoming because the legitimacy of publicly supported interventions, such as programs, cannot be based primarily on the success of individual (demonstration) projects but rather must be justified by a variety of positive externalities, such as knowledge spill-overs and network effects, produced by the intervention. Despite many innovative experiments in Norwegian and Finnish programs (Alasoini 2014;Arnkil 2004;2008;Arnold et al 2005;Gustavsen 2014;Levin 2002), no panacea to this problem has been found thus far. Programs have aimed at reforming working life, but no explicit conceptualization of the preconditions for such a change has steered their implementation or emerged from their experiences.…”
Section: Main Problems and Limitations Of The Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Salah satu komponen yang digambarkan sebagai aspek penting yang mendukung pengembangan profesionalisme dalam pendidikan profesi guru adalah implementasi penelitian tindakan kelas (Dustman et al, 2014;Gustavsen 2014;Ulvik, 2014;Phillips dan Carr, 2012;Dobber et al, 2012;Dick, 2009;Tsafos, 2009;Kitchen dan Stevens, 2008).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Trist and Bamforth (1951) brought the experiences with responsible autonomy to IDE and Norway. Today, we find this thinking in important concepts like Employee-driven innovation (Høyrup, 2010;Alasoini, 2011;Amelsvoort & Hootegem, 2017) and interdisciplinary cooperative work research as, for example, action research (Gustavsen, 2014;Levin, 2017).…”
Section: The Aftermath Of Ide: From Principles Of Organization To Primentioning
confidence: 99%