Social Identification and Interpersonal Communication in Computer-Mediated Communication: What You Do Versus Who You Are in Virtual Groups

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of interpersonal communication and intergroup identification on members' evaluations of computer-mediated groups. Participants (N = 256) in 64 four-person groups interacted through synchronous computer chat. Subgroup assignments to minimal groups instilled significantly greater in-group versus out-group identification. One member in each group was instructed to exhibit interpersonally likable or dislikable behavior. Analysis revealed that confederates acting likably were more attractive than those acting dislikably regardless of their in-group or out-group status. Further results indicated that interpersonal behavior interacted with subgroup membership on identification shifts following online discussions. Interpersonal dynamics generally provided stronger effects on members in virtual groups than did intergroup dynamics, in contrast to predictions from previous applications of social identification to computer-mediated communication.

Computer-mediated communication and the reduction of prejudice: A controlled longitudinal field experiment among Jews and Arabs in Israel

“…Although CMC users are likely to draw on social stereotypes at first acquaintance with one another, over time, online interaction should lead to individualized impressions and personal relations that are at the same time differentiated and potentially positive (see Walther & Carr, 2010). Few studies exist that simultaneously test both SIDE and SIP potentials, one exception being a laboratory experiment that employed ad hoc group identities, or ''minimal groups'' (Wang, Walther, & Hancock, 2009). In contrast, this quasi-experimental field study used longstanding, organic group memberships.…”

Tweeting for peace? Twitter and the Ardoyne parade dispute in Belfast, July 2014

“…The early cyber enthusiast literature suggested that the lack of interpersonal cues present in computermediated communication would reduce the anxiety associated with intergroup contact (Wang, et al, 2009). Mamadouh (2003) reported that Web sites could function as a platform for crosscultural exchange between Muslims and nonMuslims in the Netherlands, challenging negative stereotypes of the former in the wake of the September 11 attacks.…”

Intercultural New Media Studies: The Next Frontier in Intercultural Communication

“…16 exchange programs and multicultural classrooms (Meagher and Castanos, 1996;Colomb and Simutis (1996). More recently, scholars have examined the impact of culture on the social uses of additional new media platforms including mobile phones (Baron & Af Segerstad, 2010;Campbell, 2007;Schroeder, 2010), text messaging ( Ling, 2008;Shuter & Chattapadhyay,2010;Spurgeon & Goggin, 2007), social media (Barker & Ota, 2011;Lin, Peng, M. Kim, S. Kim & LaRose, 2012;Shu-chuan & Sejung Marina, 2011), blogs (Elola & Oskoz, 2008;Karlsson, 2006), virtual worlds (Diehl & Prins, 2008;Green & Singleton, 2007;Wang, Walther, & Hancock, 2009), and multiplayer on line games (Chia-I, 2008;Nakamura, 2009;Steinkuehler & Williams, 2006;Ward, 2010).…”