2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Human-Robot Interaction: A New Cognitive and Affective Interaction-Oriented Architecture

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we present CAIO, a Cognitive and Affective Interaction-Oriented architecture for social human-robot interactions (HRI), allowing robots to reason on mental states (including emotions), and to act physically, emotionally and verbally. We also present a short scenario and implementation on a Nao robot.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, for robots engaged in social HRI, the implementation of some of these cognitive abilities—or of them as a whole architecture—has been demonstrated in the context of autonomous social interaction (Adam et al, 2016 ; McColl et al, 2016 ), in studies aimed at the employment of joint action (Lemaignan et al, 2017 ) as well as in studies where the robot is assisting the humans in achieving their goals (Beer et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Cognitive Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, for robots engaged in social HRI, the implementation of some of these cognitive abilities—or of them as a whole architecture—has been demonstrated in the context of autonomous social interaction (Adam et al, 2016 ; McColl et al, 2016 ), in studies aimed at the employment of joint action (Lemaignan et al, 2017 ) as well as in studies where the robot is assisting the humans in achieving their goals (Beer et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Cognitive Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to human-human interaction during cognitive training by human therapists, robots need to be able to interact with users naturally in robotic rehabilitation. This includes having a good understanding of user's emotions (e.g., happiness, shame, engagement), intentions and personality (Pettinati and Arkin, 2015 ; Rahbar et al, 2015 ; Vaufreydaz et al, 2016 ; Rudovic et al, 2018 ), being able to provide an emotional response when being shared with personal information (de Graaf et al, 2015 ; Chumkamon et al, 2016 ), talking day-by-day more to the user on various topics like hobbies, and dealing with novel events (Dragone et al, 2015 ; Kostavelis et al, 2015 ; Adam et al, 2016 ; Ozcana et al, 2016 ). These natural user-robot interactions require powerful perception, reasoning, acting and learning modules in robots, or in other words, cognitive and social-emotional capabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely to other studies (Adam et al 2016;Charisi et al 2018;Robert 2018), no influence regarding how they felt about rapport building with the robot and their performance in the activity was found in this experiment, as they rated the second meeting less enjoyable than the first one (4.91 against 4.69) in item 1, although there was no significant difference. This can be associated with the novelty and their expectation of the unknown at the first interaction.…”
Section: Students Perception With Regard To the Robotcontrasting
confidence: 99%