2006
DOI: 10.1002/pad.413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social funds and decentralisation: optimal institutional design

Abstract: Social funds and decentralisation : optimal institutional designOriginally published in Public administration and development, 26 (4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past 20 years it is estimated that between five and ten billion dollars has been channelled through such social funds. Evaluations have generally confirmed that the approach is effective in reaching poor communities and improving access to services and facilities (Faguet and Wietze ). Available evidence indicated an unexpected capacity of local authorities and community organisations to manage the funding (Rawlings et al.…”
Section: Summary Of International Literature On Public Finance Managementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Over the past 20 years it is estimated that between five and ten billion dollars has been channelled through such social funds. Evaluations have generally confirmed that the approach is effective in reaching poor communities and improving access to services and facilities (Faguet and Wietze ). Available evidence indicated an unexpected capacity of local authorities and community organisations to manage the funding (Rawlings et al.…”
Section: Summary Of International Literature On Public Finance Managementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The general idea behind decentralization is that at local level there is more knowledge about the circumstances and needs of the local population, which should lead to better services [1][2][3][4][5][6], that are organized more efficiently [5] and lead to a better accountability [7]. However, there may be unexpected and even negative effects [8][9][10], such as an uneven geographical distribution of financial, human, and supply resources; local governments may pursuit their own specific interests, making it difficult to establish and achieve national priorities and in practice the public appears to have less influence in decision making and assessing priorities as expected [6,11].…”
Section: The Role Of the Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, the discussion centres on the form and extent of councils' upwards and downwards accountability (Fauget and Wietzke, 2006). 6 The following accountability mechanisms are highlighted in the literature.…”
Section: Analysing Distributional Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%