2005
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.187.5.401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social fragmentation, deprivation and urbanicity: relation to first-admission rates for psychoses

Abstract: First-admission rates are strongly associated with measures of social fragmentation, independent of material deprivation and urban/rural category.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
136
3
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
10
136
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A measure of fragmentation combining a number of relevant variables was developed by Congdon (1996) in relation to area suicide and self-harm contrasts within London, and has been applied in other studies of psychiatric illness and suicide. For example, Allardyce et al (2005) find this fragmentation score to be a significant risk factor for psychotic admissions after allowing for deprivation, while Evans et al (2004) find a significant association between social fragmentation and suicide that is not explained away by socioeconomic deprivation.…”
Section: Use Of Latent Area Constructs In Area Studies Of Suicide Andmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A measure of fragmentation combining a number of relevant variables was developed by Congdon (1996) in relation to area suicide and self-harm contrasts within London, and has been applied in other studies of psychiatric illness and suicide. For example, Allardyce et al (2005) find this fragmentation score to be a significant risk factor for psychotic admissions after allowing for deprivation, while Evans et al (2004) find a significant association between social fragmentation and suicide that is not explained away by socioeconomic deprivation.…”
Section: Use Of Latent Area Constructs In Area Studies Of Suicide Andmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These factors may operate at many levels (individual, familial, community, or societal), making the links with urbanicity immediately apparent. At the community level, there is growing evidence that neighborhoods that are more socially fragmented, or have lower levels of social capital, have higher incidence rates of schizophrenia 58,59 , a finding not apparently confounded by socioeconomic deprivation. 57 Progress to identify putative societal-level factors using an eco-epidemiological perspective has been mirrored by efforts to identify more specific individual-level environmental factors over the life course, which may later increase schizophrenia risk.…”
Section: What Has Eco-epidemiology Taught Us?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smarter human communities are equivalent to smarter cities, and are communities that strengthen human bonds and services [53]. Socially segregated cities show symptoms of social disorder, which causes diverse problematics, such as crime or illness [33,53] Thus, the idea of smart cities can be associated with citizens that are active and aware of the need of integration and cooperation. The governance dimension and the live-city dimension are citizen-centric dimensions related to cooperation, participation, and a capacity for adaptation [54].…”
Section: The Meaning Of Smart City In the Conceptual Urban Quality Spmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social fragmentation is seen as a phenomenon that reduces the quality of life within a society. For instance, higher first admissions for psychosis are associated with high social fragmentation [33]. Social capital is influenced by the intensity of social links constructed by trust, sharing, and reciprocity [34].…”
Section: Livability Life-ability and The Construction Of 'Quality Omentioning
confidence: 99%