2019
DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2019.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social formation and collapse in the Tisza-Maros region: dating the Maros Group and its Late Bronze Age successors

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a different GIS analytical method, Quinn and Ciugudean (2018) demonstrated the shift away from metal procurement landscapes toward interregional trade routes from the EBA to the MBA. The shift in settlement networks from the MBA to the LBA is also consistent with disruptions in the organization of settlement systems seen after 1500 BC throughout the Carpathian Basin and Transylvania (see Ciugudean and Quinn 2015; Duffy, Parditka et al 2019; O'Shea 2011; O'Shea et al 2019). The emergence of large fortified sites during the LBA is consistent with the presumed population aggregation and selection of more-defensible site locations seen in this model (e.g., Gogâltan and Sava 2010; Szentmiklosi et al 2011; Uhnér et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussion: Bronze Age Hunedoara Socioeconomic Organization supporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using a different GIS analytical method, Quinn and Ciugudean (2018) demonstrated the shift away from metal procurement landscapes toward interregional trade routes from the EBA to the MBA. The shift in settlement networks from the MBA to the LBA is also consistent with disruptions in the organization of settlement systems seen after 1500 BC throughout the Carpathian Basin and Transylvania (see Ciugudean and Quinn 2015; Duffy, Parditka et al 2019; O'Shea 2011; O'Shea et al 2019). The emergence of large fortified sites during the LBA is consistent with the presumed population aggregation and selection of more-defensible site locations seen in this model (e.g., Gogâltan and Sava 2010; Szentmiklosi et al 2011; Uhnér et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussion: Bronze Age Hunedoara Socioeconomic Organization supporting
confidence: 63%
“…This omission is primarily due to the lack of systematic archaeological surveys in the county. The counties around Hunedoara—Alba to the east and Arad to the west—have been the focus of recent research into the development of social complexity in the Bronze Age (see Nicodemus 2014; O'Shea 1996, 2011; O'Shea and Nicodemus 2019; O'Shea et al 2019; Quinn 2017). Hunedoara also encompasses the headwaters of the Körös River, known as the Criș in Romania, which has seen significant regional archaeological work (Duffy 2014, 2015; Duffy, Paja et al 2019; Duffy, Parditka et al 2019; Duffy et al 2013).…”
Section: Settlement Systems and Emergent Hierarchy In Bronze Age Minimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results demonstrate that the tempo plot technique has wide applicability for quantifying the timing and rate of change of archaeological processes, in particular declines or cessation of activities associated with purported 'collapse' events and provides a viable alternative to the more common approach of using summed probability distributions of radiocarbon dates. Tempo plots can also provide a useful extension of more common Bayesian approaches and offer ways to better characterize and quantify similar case studies around the world, such as the rate of decline at various Maya political centers (e.g., Ebert et al, 2017Ebert et al, , 2016Hoggarth et al, 2016) and other areas (e.g., Bar-Oz et al, 2019;Carter et al, 2019;O'Shea et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has approximately 130 graves (135, including multiple burials), with both inhumations and cremations. Radiocarbon dating places the cemetery between 1950 and 1800 BC [67].…”
Section: Archaeological Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P. Fischl [81,82] revisited the field notes from the excavation and corrected some inconsistencies, published the cemetery map and refined the chronology [83]. Several graves were radiocarbon dated and fall between 2100 and 1600 BC [67].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%