2007
DOI: 10.1002/icd.524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social experiences in infancy and early childhood co‐sleeping

Abstract: Infancy and early childhood sleep-wake behaviours from current and retrospective parental reports were used to explore the relationship between sleeping arrangements and parent-child nighttime interactions at both time points. Children (N ¼ 45) from educated, middle-class families, mostly breastfed in infancy, composed a convenience sample that was recruited from a university preschool in the Northeast US. Parents responded to the Sleep Habits Inventory, a 19-item Likert-style inventory measuring sleep-related… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sleep regulation is strongly promoted as a developmental milestone by parents, and is related to parental practices regarding parent-child sleep proximity during infancy (Hayes, Robert, & Stowe, 1996; Hayes, Fukumizu, Troese, Sallinen, & Gilles, 2007). In the current study, parental sleep practices and co-sleeping or night-time proximity to the parents’ bed at 16 months were found to be unrelated to infant temperament or sleep problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sleep regulation is strongly promoted as a developmental milestone by parents, and is related to parental practices regarding parent-child sleep proximity during infancy (Hayes, Robert, & Stowe, 1996; Hayes, Fukumizu, Troese, Sallinen, & Gilles, 2007). In the current study, parental sleep practices and co-sleeping or night-time proximity to the parents’ bed at 16 months were found to be unrelated to infant temperament or sleep problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a case in point, higher rates of all-night co-sleeping were found in urban Latino families compared to middle-class Caucasian families in a study conducted by Schachter, Fuchs, Bijur, and Stone (1989); however, in that study, frequent part-night co-sleeping was significantly lower and less normative among Latino families. Hayes, Fukumizu, Troese, Sallinen, and Gilles (2007) observed that the unstable nature of part-night co-sleeping may be relevant for the development of sleep disturbances. Ball (2007) makes the point that asking parents whether any bedsharing occurred would produce a much higher prevalence rate than asking whether bedsharing occurred over a given threshold of a certain number of nights per week and hours per night, or restricting the use of the term to full-night, every night bedsharing.…”
Section: Terminology Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This term has its origins in the writing of Lozoff, Wolf, and Davis (1984), but this subgroup has been rather understudied until recently. With some variability across studies, reactive co-sleeping refers to children who start to share or return to the parents' bed as toddlers or preschoolers following an extended period of solitary sleeping during infancy (Hayes et al, 2007;Keller & Goldberg, 2004). Ramos and colleagues (2007) also use the term to capture an unplanned, unwanted cosleeping arrangement, defining reactive co-sleeping as children who co-sleep because they have difficulty sleeping alone even though the parents prefer separate sleep arrangements.…”
Section: Terminology Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…New to this study, a sleep arrangement variable was created that represented relative proximity or physical closeness to parents while sleeping (see also Hayes, Fukumizu, Troese, Sallinen, & Gilles, 2007). Solitary sleepers had the most distal sleep arrangement, as they were reported to sleep in their own room all night (6 m: 38%, n 5 33; 12 m: 54%, n 5 47).…”
Section: Sleep Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%