2003
DOI: 10.4314/jsda.v18i1.23818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social exclusion and social security: the case of Zimbabwe

Abstract: The African e-Journals Project has digitized full text of articles of eleven social science and humanities journals. This item is from the digital archive maintained by Michigan State University Library.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous assessments of Drought Relief in Zimbabwe in the 1980s and 1990s have been based on administrative data regarding aggregate distributions of rations (Sithole and Chikanda, 1994; Tobaiwa, 1993; WFP 1994; World Bank, 1995), a cursory analysis of national household survey data (Inter‐Ministerial Committee, 1993a, 1993b, and 1996), or on small‐scale ethnographic studies (Mararike, 1999). Some studies have used a mixture of these methods (Borsotti, 1993; Drèze and Sen, 1989: 146–151; Eldridge, 2002; Hicks, 1993; ILO 1993; Kaseke, 1993; Kaseke et al, 1997; Rukuni and Jayne, 1995; Sen, 1999: 177–9; Thompson, 1993). Some studies have relied on household surveys of sub‐national populations, like people living in resettlement areas (e.g.…”
Section: Drought Relief In Zimbabwe 1982‐2000mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous assessments of Drought Relief in Zimbabwe in the 1980s and 1990s have been based on administrative data regarding aggregate distributions of rations (Sithole and Chikanda, 1994; Tobaiwa, 1993; WFP 1994; World Bank, 1995), a cursory analysis of national household survey data (Inter‐Ministerial Committee, 1993a, 1993b, and 1996), or on small‐scale ethnographic studies (Mararike, 1999). Some studies have used a mixture of these methods (Borsotti, 1993; Drèze and Sen, 1989: 146–151; Eldridge, 2002; Hicks, 1993; ILO 1993; Kaseke, 1993; Kaseke et al, 1997; Rukuni and Jayne, 1995; Sen, 1999: 177–9; Thompson, 1993). Some studies have relied on household surveys of sub‐national populations, like people living in resettlement areas (e.g.…”
Section: Drought Relief In Zimbabwe 1982‐2000mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“Zimbabwe's drought‐relief programmes…, given the magnitude of the grain deficits faced by many rural households,… can only be seen as somewhat cosmetic” (Rukuni and Jayne, 1995: 55). Kaseke's assessment (1993: 56) was equally blunt: ‘the food provided… is hardly sufficient to sustain a family.… (T)he drought relief programme as it is presently organised cannot be considered a meaningful social security scheme”.…”
Section: Drought Relief In Zimbabwe 1982‐2000mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Kaseke (2003) GoZ operates a non-contributory public assistance programme providing assistance in cash or kind to destitute persons targeting vulnerable groups such as the elderly, persons with disabilities, the chronically ill and dependants of indigent persons. The scheme is meanstested and is administered by the Department of Social Services.…”
Section: Social Welfare Safety Nets Implemented In Zimbabwementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reform in Ghana had hit hard the rural households, low-income urban households and children under 5 years of age. Similarly, in Zimbabwe, which began implementing SAP in 1991, increased maternal mortality rates were noted because of the introduction of hospital fees for those earning more than four-hundred Zimbabwean dollars and above per month (Kumssa, 2006;Kaseke, 2003). In the developing world, structural adjustment meant an acceptance of neoclassical theory that sought to make both the state and the market more efficient, thereby accelerating growth and eliminating waste.…”
Section: Discontent With Socialism and Structural Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical of other African colonies, the welfare system in Rhodesia (the pre-independence name of Zimbabwe) was principally designed for the benefit of the white communities. In the African communities, traditional structures provided what help was possible for vulnerable groups like the very old and the very young, but when Zimbabwe gained independence and sought to modernize, the inadequacy of the past institutional and traditional arrangements, especially in the matter of income maintenance, became apparent (Kaseke, 2003). The social exclusion in formal social security programs forced the excluded groups to rely on traditional kinship-based networks and mutual aid arrangements, which were-and remain-incapable of meeting all but the most basic needs, and often not even those.…”
Section: Welfare and Its Multiple Expressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%