Social Exclusion and Civil Law: Experience of Civil Justice Problems among Vulnerable Groups

Abstract

Combating social exclusion has become a priority target for many governments and was a key factor in the establishment of the Legal Services Commission (LSC) and the Community Legal Service (CLS) in England and Wales in April . This study aims to assess whether socially excluded groups within the general population are more likely to suffer justiciable problems (problems for which there is a potential legal remedy) and whether such groups differ in their problem resolution strategies and advice-seeking behaviour. We draw upon a large-scale survey of  ,  people representative of the population of England and Wales, and a further survey of  people in temporary accommodation. Five vulnerable groups are extracted: survey respondents with a long-term illness or disability, young and elderly respondents, low-income respondents and those living in temporary accommodation. We identify how some of these vulnerable groups have a high likelihood of experiencing justiciable problems. We also examine advice-seeking strategies among our vulnerable groups and, where contact was made, which advisers were typically contacted. The findings demonstrate the potentially crucial role of access to justice and advice and legal services in tackling social exclusion.

Domestic violence, housing and employment: Workers' perspectives on employment assistance in supported accommodation

“…However, many authors propose that enhancing women's employment opportunities, economic capacity and housing options have positive associations with women's and their families' psycho-emotional wellbeing (Buck et al 2005;Perkins 2008;Law & Ewens 2010). Employment is a key pathway to economic independence, housing security and stability for both women and their children.…”

When legal rights are not a reality: do individuals know their rights and how can we tell?

“…Interestingly, many of the problem types for which knowledge was poor at the outset, were related to social exclusion and vulnerability, including rented housing, money, debt, benefits, education and domestic violence as has been noted by both Buck et al (2005, 2008), Balmer et al , (2010) and Denvir et al , (2012). This may be related to the complexity of the problem, or potentially the low rate at which individuals with these problem types seek professional advice (see further Pleasence et al , 2011, p. 43).…”

Back for the future: a client centred analysis of social welfare and family law provision

“…Pleasence et al 2004, Moorhead et al 2006, Smith et al 2013 and how different vulnerable groups experience civil justice problems (e.g. Williams 2004, Mason et al 2009, Buck et al 2005. Research on adviceseeking behaviour (e.g.…”