2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-018-4049-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Enterprises, Venture Philanthropy and the Alleviation of Income Inequality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their approach is deeply influenced by their business experience and domain (Gordon, ). This new movement is called “venture philanthropy,” but it is also referred to as impact investment (Di Lorenzo & Scarlata, ). According to the European Venture Philanthropy Association (EVPA), venture philanthropy is a high‐engagement and long‐term commitment to generate impact through tailored financing, organisational support, and impact measurement and management.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Their approach is deeply influenced by their business experience and domain (Gordon, ). This new movement is called “venture philanthropy,” but it is also referred to as impact investment (Di Lorenzo & Scarlata, ). According to the European Venture Philanthropy Association (EVPA), venture philanthropy is a high‐engagement and long‐term commitment to generate impact through tailored financing, organisational support, and impact measurement and management.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their approach is deeply influenced by their business experience and domain (Gordon, 2014). This new movement is called "venture philanthropy," but it is also referred to as impact investment (Di Lorenzo & Scarlata, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, just like social enterprises, DSIs need to adopt an economic, utilitarian, orientation in that they are called to respond to the typical market mechanisms that allow innovations to survive. As such, DSIs undertake what has been defined as a dual organizational identity orientation (Brickson, 2005;Di Lorenzo & Scarlata, 2019;Moss, Short, Payne, & Lumpkin, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in turn, may result in defying economic sustainability to fulfil the organizational social mission, and vice versa, leading to potential threats to growth (Kannothra, Manning, & Haigh, 2018), identity (Smith, Knapp, Barr, Stevens, & Cannatelli, 2010), social and economic performance (Battilana, Sengul, Pache, & Model, 2014;Stevens, Moray, & Bruneel, 2015), legitimacy (Battilana & Lee, 2014;Pache & Santos, 2012) and, ultimately, survival (Gras & Mendoza-Abarca, 2014;Tracey, Phillips, & Jarvis, 2011). At the same time, Moss et al (2011) show that social enterprises (SEs) have a higher social, collectivistic orientation than their commercial counterparts, whereas Bacq and Eddleston (2018) as well as Di Lorenzo and Scarlata (2019) show that the development of an economically oriented organizational mindset helps SEs to increase their social impact. SEs tend to rely on a linguistic, highly values-centered discourse to make sense of and convey what they do to the multitude of stakeholders they work with (Lee, Ramus, & Vaccaro, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%