2010
DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2010.511815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Enterprise: Implications of Emerging Institutionalized Constructions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such strong views of discourse stress that social enterprise exerts its influence through either the normalizing force of a financial or legal disciplinary mechanism (Levander, 2010;Mason, 2012) or, more subtly, the moral legitimacy ascribed to businesslike activities and mentalities (Dart, 2004). However, there are good reasons for revisiting these assumptions.…”
Section: Social Enterprise As Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such strong views of discourse stress that social enterprise exerts its influence through either the normalizing force of a financial or legal disciplinary mechanism (Levander, 2010;Mason, 2012) or, more subtly, the moral legitimacy ascribed to businesslike activities and mentalities (Dart, 2004). However, there are good reasons for revisiting these assumptions.…”
Section: Social Enterprise As Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, more recently, some scholars have studied other applications of social entrepreneurship such as a tool for governance (Levander 2010), most studies in the area still revolve around its capacity to empower marginalised individuals and communities.…”
Section: Social Entrepreneurship In Indonesia 279mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals such as Muhamad Yunus, founder of Grameen Bank, and Jamie Oliver, owner of the Fifteen Restaurants, are considered to be social entrepreneurs because of their ability to apply entrepreneurial principles to improve literacy, create employment, alleviate poverty, et cetera, for the underprivileged. Because of its increasing contributions to the development of marginalised communities, social entrepreneurship has gained significance as an area of scholarly research since the early 2000s (Defourny and Nyssens 2008;Levander 2010). Much of the interest has been concerned with the underlying philosophies and theoretical underpinnings of social entrepreneurship, which serve as the foundation of conceptual frameworks needed for future empirical research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that social entrepreneurs usually create mechanisms and tools that both reduce the stakeholders' dependencies on the organization, and increase the stakeholders' abilities to contribute to the solution and to their own welfare (Santos, 2012). Levander (2010) suggests a theoretical framework from neo-institutionalism to conceptualize the social enterprise as a method of empowering marginalized individuals or disadvantaged groups, such as women, while providing a long term solution to structural issues across society. An analysis of the different definitions of social enterprises highlights six distinctive elements, which can be classified into three levels: nature, implementation and impact.…”
Section: Social Enterprises and Empowerment Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%