Social Engagement versus Isolation in the Well-being of Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Abstract

This review analyzes the implications of social engagement versus isolation to wellbeing and among individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), more specifically influences of social interventions, opportunities for involvement in social activities (i.e., skills training, vocational programs, sports, and community engagements), social media use, and mobile apps. All of which offer an opportunity for social interaction that may not be feasible under typical circumstances. It questions how these social influences affect the well-being and adjustment of individuals with ASD. It is important to consider how these forms of social engagement relate to the well-being of individuals with ASD, especially because of the increasing amount of literature that has suggested better outcomes for individuals with ASD who are presented with opportunities for social engagement. This review will be directed through the analysis of literature relative to improvements to well-being resulting from different areas of social engagement. Its goal is to bring awareness to and increase the amount of knowledge regarding the significance of social engagement, and how it is essential to overall well-being and social adjustment. This can be useful information for clinicians and counselors to consider in their work with individuals on the spectrum who may be seeking their help or support.

Clinical intervention with autistic adolescents and adults during the first two months of the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences of clinicians and their clients

“…Challenging the status quo. Despite a potential preference for some adults with autism towards isolation, literature on the well-being of autistic individuals describes the benefits of socializing with others (Jones, 2019). Clinicians reinforced the potential benefits of connecting with family members in their household (where positive dynamics existed), friends or family online and encouraged clients to explore activity outside of their bedrooms daily.…”

Facilitating Access to Mental Health Services: A Stakeholder-Driven Improvement of the Children and Young People (CYP) as One Referral Platform

“…The Liverpool City Region has experienced a 23% rise in child poverty since 2015, and it ranks as the third most deprived region in England, regarding disability support provisions [ 1 ]. Both variables are associated with adverse effects on children and young people’s (CYP) mental health, such as a lack of available support, and poorer emotional regulation and coping skills [ 1 , 2 ]. Health inequalities hinder the access of CYP to mental health services, exacerbating the mental health needs of underserved communities [ 1 ].…”