2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2005.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social effects on crowding preferences of urban forest visitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
58
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors segment by using combined variables, including motivational or sociodemographic factors, or other psychographic factors (Farías Torbidoni et al 2005;Taczanowska et al 2006;Smith et al 2014). Typologies based on crowding perception (Arnberger & Haider 2005) or type of activity (Burns & Graefe 2002) are also common in tourism literature. Modern solutions such as fuzzy segmentation are also found (D'Urso et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors segment by using combined variables, including motivational or sociodemographic factors, or other psychographic factors (Farías Torbidoni et al 2005;Taczanowska et al 2006;Smith et al 2014). Typologies based on crowding perception (Arnberger & Haider 2005) or type of activity (Burns & Graefe 2002) are also common in tourism literature. Modern solutions such as fuzzy segmentation are also found (D'Urso et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, large numbers of people visit these spaces for a variety of purposes throughout the year [2]. These diverse purposes and usages are arguably one of the specific characteristics of the suburban and urban open spaces [3]. The trend indicates that demands for such open spaces in the neighborhood are increasing as people become more demanding for a natural experience when seeking refuge from urbanization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this working paper scope, by adjusting 'number of boaters' will have an impact of crowding distribution but, the adjustment will manipulate the 'enjoyment level'. Therefore, this suggests interlinking 'number of boaters' and 'time spend', looking at [9] findings on tourists' categorization: crowding-averse and crowding-tolerant. By doing so, this will help in balancing the perceived crowd and the accepted crowding ('number of people seen' and 'maximum number of people to see') factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To [3], crowding '...is not simply related to the density of people in a given area, but involves a cognitive evaluation of the social and resource conditions encountered by the recreationist'. [9] who define crowding as '...a negative evaluation of use levels or number of encounters with other users', categorize crowding into crowding-averse and crowding-tolerant segments. The paradigm shift between crowding-averse and crowding-tolerant, to a certain extent, is influenced by one's psychology stability in accepting changes of the surroundings.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%