Social‐ecological reflexivity of extractive industry governance? The case of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Indonesia

Abstract

The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) sets standards to improve the governance of extractive industries and thereby stimulate sustainable development. Member countries implement this standard through a multi‐stakeholder group (MSG) which facilitates deliberation between government, civil society and business representatives. This deliberation could enable what we call ‘social‐ecological reflexivity’: the ability to reconfigure oneself in response to critical reflection on one's performance in governing not only the economic, but also the social and environmental dimensions of sustainable development. Such reflexivity is crucial for countries to not only comply with the EITI standard, but also improve governance quality to address the social and environmental impacts from extractive industries. Drawing on a fully operationalised conceptual framework, we analyse social‐ecological reflexivity in the implementation of the EITI in Indonesia, a country that is heavily impacted by extractive industries. We draw on content analysis of the MSG meeting minutes and EITI‐Indonesia reports between 2012 and 2019. We show that the EITI‐Indonesia has not (yet) generated deep social‐ecological reflexivity. First, there is limited recognition and rethinking of extractive industry governance and no real response in the form of governance reforms. Second, there are even signs of what we call ‘anti‐reflexivity’, whereby members of the multi‐stakeholder group ignore and resist public debates around the negative impacts from extractive industries. In analysing the different components and degrees of reflexivity around the EITI‐Indonesia, the article provides vital insights into the (study of) conditions under which global norms such as the EITI find meaning in and affect specific contexts.

Green resolution and resilience of palm oil exports in Indonesia: Strengthening local value chains

“…This finding is in line with previous empirical results, namely, among others, [9], [12] In the long term, green financing resolutions have a support obligation for economic sustainability, especially international trade [35]. Export marketing activities that are not supported by the reconstruction of the use of natural resources and are only limited to economic benefits, on the contrary, cause scarcity due to exploitation without thinking about resilience and sustainability in the future [34]. The relationship between green financing resolution in the short-term can control green investment to reduce unhealthy export.…”

“…Various economic recovery efforts have been prioritized in building green economy resolution consisting of green trading markets, green financing, and green entrepreneurship [27]. On the other hand, Indonesia's economic approach is still classified as an extractive and short-term economy [34]. That is, economic activity does not pay attention to the quality of natural resources and the environment, so this has an impact on the scarcity of natural resources.…”

Seaweed blooms in paradise: Ecological reflexivity, governance and the Sargassum crisis in the Mexican Caribbean

“…Reflexivity is facilitated by: 1) deliberative processes involving actors from different levels of governance, with different knowledge, experiences, and the capacity to seriously consider alternatives for understanding the problem, along with multiple approaches to potential solutions; and 2) the ability to review cognitive and normative beliefs and reconsider institutional arrangements and practices, as well as the values and assumptions that underpin them (Dryzek and Pickering, 2018;Feindt and Weinland, 2018). Including ecological reflexivity in governance schemes means understanding and managing the links between institutional change and socioenvironmental systems (Yanuardi et al 2022). Ultimately, ecological reflexivity aims to overcome the human-nature dichotomy and incorporate the "complexities and systemic interdependencies that define the dynamic world of the Anthropocene" into environmental policy (Biermann, 2021).…”

Governance for sustainability in the extractive industry sector: Addressing the Resource Curse through Global Standard-Setting - Experiences from Indonesia

“…Chapter 4 is based on an ar cle tled "Social-ecological reflexivity of extrac ve industry governance? The case of the Extrac ve Industries Transparency Ini a ve in Indonesia" by Yanuardi et al (2022b) and published in the Environmental Policy and Governance journal (Q1). This chapter examines the extent to which delibera on within the EITI-Indonesia encourages extrac ve industry governance to reflect on their (governance) performance in contribu ng to sustainable development.…”

“…Social-Ecological Peace -A framework to analyze the transi on from violence to peace in post-conflict areas, applied to Aceh, Indonesia. Journal of Poli cal Ecology, 29(1), 247-265. h ps://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.4707 Yanuardi, Y., Vijge, M. J., & Biermann, F. (2022b). Social-ecological reflexivity of extrac ve industry governance?…”