2014
DOI: 10.1111/eth.12318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Dominance in a Gregarious Bird is Related to Body Size But not to Standard Personality Assays

Abstract: The recent growth of research on animal personality could provide new insights into our understanding of sociality and the structure of animal groups. Although simple assays of the type commonly used to study animal personality have been shown to correlate with social aggressiveness in some bird species, conflicting empirical results do not yet make it clear when such assays, typically using isolated individuals, predict behaviour within social groups. We measured aggressiveness in groups of a very gregarious … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(103 reference statements)
3
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Normally, larger individuals in most species have a stronger competitive ability, so it is common for larger individuals to attack smaller ones [103][104][105]. In this study, we found that aggression was significantly and positively associated with BM in Asian particolored bats.…”
Section: Effects Of Body Size On Personalitiessupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Normally, larger individuals in most species have a stronger competitive ability, so it is common for larger individuals to attack smaller ones [103][104][105]. In this study, we found that aggression was significantly and positively associated with BM in Asian particolored bats.…”
Section: Effects Of Body Size On Personalitiessupporting
confidence: 49%
“…It is worth noting that all of these studies refer to aggressive interactions between individuals whereas in the present study we employed the mirror test in a social context. P. reticulata is a strongly schooling species and the mirror test has been widely used in fish to measure social cooperation (De Santi et al, 2001 ; Dadda et al, 2007 ; Karenina et al, 2013 ; Regolin et al, 2013 ; Funghi et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By reducing the time and energy devoted to agonistic encounters, individually beneficial behaviours such as maintenance, vigilance, and foraging can be invested in more heavily [11]. The exact drivers that determine positioning within a dominance hierarchy have been traditionally assumed to include body mass and structural size (reviewed in [14]), but more recently, individual personality traits of group members have been demonstrated to affect dominance [15]. Accordingly, different personality traits may confer different benefits and costs, depending on how they interact with position within a dominance hierarchy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%