Social diversity and access to healthcare in Europe: how does European Union’s legislation prevent from discrimination in healthcare?

Abstract

Background Social diversity can affect healthcare outcomes in situations when access to healthcare is limited for specific groups. Although the principle of equality is one of the central topics on the agenda of the European Union (EU), its scope in the field of healthcare, however, is relatively unexplored. The aim of this study is to identify and systematically analyze primary and secondary legislation of the EU Institutions that concern the issue of access to healthcare for various minority groups. In our research, we have concentrated on three features of diversity: a) gender identity and sexual orientation, b) race and ethnicity, and c) religion or belief. Method and materials For the purpose of this analysis, we conducted a search of database Eur-Lex, the official website of European Union law and other public documents of the European Union, based on specific keywords accompanied by review of secondary literature. Relevant documents were examined with regard to the research topic. Our search covered documents that were in force between 13 December 2007 and 31 July 2019. Results Generally, the EU legal system prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion or belief, racial or ethnic origin, sex, and sexual orientation. However, with regard to the issue of non-discrimination in access to healthcare EU secondary law provides protection against discrimination only on the grounds of racial or ethnic origin and sex. The issue of discrimination in healthcare on the grounds of religion or belief, gender identity and sexual orientation is not specifically addressed under EU secondary law. Discussion The absence of regulations regarding non-discrimination in the EU secondary law in the area of healthcare may result from the division of competences between the European Union and the Member States. Reluctance of the Member States to adopt comprehensive antidiscrimination regulations leads to a situation, in which protection in access to healthcare primarily depends on national regulations. Conclusions Our study shows that EU antidiscriminatory law with regard to access to healthcare is fragmentary. Prohibition of discrimination of the level of European binding law does not fully encompass all aspects of social diversity.

Vulnerability and COVID-19 infection rates: A changing relationship during the first year of the pandemic

“…Additionally, it is usually argued that people of low socioeconomic status visit health centres at a more advanced stage of the disease and are less confident that they will be treated respectfully, thus resulting in worse health outcomes ( Szczepura, 2005 ). Moreover, in situations when access to healthcare is limited – as occurred in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic– some minority groups may encounter more difficulties in accessing healthcare services and even situations of discrimination on the grounds of socioeconomic status, racial or ethnic origin and sex ( Orzechowski, et al, 2020 ).…”

Diversität verpflichtet. Medizin in einer pluralistischen Gesellschaft

“…Verschiedene Wertevorstellungen, kulturelle Überzeugungen und ethische Positionen bestimmen unser gemeinsames Leben. Soziale Veränderungen, demographische Entwicklungen und die wachsende Diversifizierung der Gesellschaft gehören zu den zentralen Themen, mit denen das Gesundheitswesen nicht nur in den Nationalstaaten sondern auch auf europäischer Ebene konfrontiert ist (Steger, 2019;Orzechowski et al, 2020). 1 Ein besonderes Spannungsfeld entsteht, wenn die Konzepte der individuellen Entscheidungsfreiheit und pluralistischen Gesellschaftsordnung mit den Prinzipien der Medizin im Sinn eines verantwortlichen und fürsorglichen Handelns kollidieren.…”

SPINE20 recommendations 2022: spine care—working together to recover stronger

“…Access to care relates to the timely use of health services to achieve the best health outcomes [11]. Globally, individuals of lower socioeconomic status, women, visible minorities, people with disabilities, and other vulnerable populations are significantly disadvantaged by limited access to care and suboptimal health outcomes [12]. This is mainly due to the multiple challenges related to achieving equity [12].…”

“…Globally, individuals of lower socioeconomic status, women, visible minorities, people with disabilities, and other vulnerable populations are significantly disadvantaged by limited access to care and suboptimal health outcomes [12]. This is mainly due to the multiple challenges related to achieving equity [12]. Diverse healthcare systems exist around the globe, and several are equipped to benefit patients while managing significant financial constraints [13].…”