2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social distance and trust: Experimental evidence from a slum in Cairo

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
39
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A disadvantage is that our analysis cannot contribute much to the literature on network formation and the differential performances of formed networks, as our neighbors are set according to distance and, thus, are practically given. 2 Second, our paper adds to the body of literature that found the effects of social ties in the real world on social behavior in their experiments (Binzel and Fehr, 2013;Etang et al, 2011;Goette et al, 2012). Our paper is consistent with these predecessors in that the farmers' experience of collective irrigation management is associated with the interdependence of general social behaviors in the experiment.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A disadvantage is that our analysis cannot contribute much to the literature on network formation and the differential performances of formed networks, as our neighbors are set according to distance and, thus, are practically given. 2 Second, our paper adds to the body of literature that found the effects of social ties in the real world on social behavior in their experiments (Binzel and Fehr, 2013;Etang et al, 2011;Goette et al, 2012). Our paper is consistent with these predecessors in that the farmers' experience of collective irrigation management is associated with the interdependence of general social behaviors in the experiment.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The average of global scores within evaluates initial safe peers and new peers. We confirm how global scores change when aggregation [16], [17] cycle increases and ratio of initial peers decreases.…”
Section: Global Scores Of Safe Peerssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…3 Invited residents were required to participate together with a friend. In total, we con-1 In Binzel and Fehr (2013) we examine how the social distance between players affects behavior in a binary trust game with hidden action. We use respondents' behavior in one of the two dictator games to control for other-regarding preferences, but do not analyze the data from the dictator games itself.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After playing a binary trust game with hidden action (for details see Binzel and Fehr, 2013), participants played several variants of the dictator game, in which they were asked to allocate an endowment of 20 Egyptian Pound (L.E. )…”
Section: Experimental Design and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%