Social Disadvantage, Politics, and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Trends: A County-level Analysis of United States Data

Abstract

Background Understanding the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 is essential for public health control efforts. Social, demographic, and political characteristics at the US county level might be associated with changes in SARS-CoV-2 case incidence. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of the relationship between the change in reported SARS-CoV-2 case counts at the US county level during June 1, 2020 – June 30,2020 and social, demographic, and political characteristics of the county. Results 1023/3142 US counties were included in the analysis. 678 (66·3%) had increasing, and 345 (33·7%) had non-increasing SARS-CoV-2 case counts between June 1 – June 30, 2020. In bivariate analysis, counties with increasing case counts had significantly higher Social Deprivation Index (median 48, IQR 24 – 72) than counties with non-increasing case counts (median 40, IQR 19 – 66; p=0·009). Counties with increasing case counts were significantly more likely to be metropolitan areas of 250,000 – 1 million population (p&0·001), to have a higher percentage of Black residents (9% vs. 6%, p=0·013), and to have voted for the Republican presidential candidate in 2016 by a 10-point or greater margin (p=0·044). In the multivariable model, metropolitan areas of 250,000 – 1 million population, higher percentage of Black residents and a 10-point or greater Republican victory were independently associated with increasing case counts. Conclusions Increasing case counts of SARS-CoV-2 in the US during June 2020 were associated with a combination of sociodemographic and political factors. Addressing social disadvantage and differential belief systems that may correspond with political alignment will play a critical role in pandemic control.

High-throughput wastewater analysis for substance use assessment in central New York during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…[25][26][27] For example, comorbidities associated with substance use disorders (e.g., cardiovascular, metabolic, pulmonary, and respiratory diseases) are known to exacerbate COVID-19 mortality and related health outcomes. [28][29][30][31] Meanwhile, socioeconomic disparities in health exert a disproportionate impact on the severity of COVID-19 in certain racial and ethnic minority populations (e.g., African-American) [32][33][34] and disadvantaged communities, [35][36][37] particularly those having a higher prevalence of substance use disorders. 25 Furthermore, COVID-related nonpharmaceutical interventions (e.g., lockdowns) and pharmacologic treatments may in turn contribute to changes in substance use behaviors.…”

SEIR Model to address the impact of face masks amid COVID‐19 pandemic

“…Also, we assumed that all individuals in a population exhibited similar behavior and incurred similar risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 acquisition. However, on account of different behaviors and other social variables, some members of a population can have notably increased or decreased risk of acquiring COVID‐19, and this risk can change over time (Mourad et al., 2020 ). As a result, real‐world scenarios for many countries are unlikely to reach peak and trough infection rates given by our models.…”

Prevalence of RT-qPCR-detected SARS-CoV-2 infection at schools: First results from the Austrian School-SARS-CoV-2 prospective cohort study

“…These likely go beyond school-related factors and may include less selfisolation and physical distancing, 26 cramped living conditions, 26 and lack of possibilities for parents to work from home, also coupled with challenges in taking care of a sick child. Of note, ecological analyses in the US 27 and Germany 28 have previously shown that deprived areas are disproportionately affected by SARS-CoV-2. It is also noteworthy that we detected no significant differences in SARS-CoV-2 prevalence between primary vs. secondary schools, smaller vs. larger class sizes, pupils vs. teachers, and females vs. males, nor according to the participants' age.…”