Social dilemma cooperation (unlike Dictator Game giving) is intuitive for men as well as women

Abstract

Does intuition favor prosociality, or does prosocial behavior require deliberative self-control? The Social Heuristics Hypothesis (SHH) stipulates that intuition favors typically advantageous behavior – but which behavior is typically advantageous depends on both the individual and the context. For example, non-zero-sum cooperation (e.g. in social dilemmas like the Prisoner's Dilemma) typically pays off because of the opportunity for reciprocity. Conversely, reciprocity does not promote zero-sum cash transfers (e.g. in the Dictator Game, DG). Instead, DG giving can be long-run advantageous because of reputation concerns: social norms often require such behavior of women but not men. Thus, the SHH predicts that intuition will favor social dilemma cooperation regardless of gender, but only favor DG giving among women. Here I present meta-analytic evidence in support of this prediction. In 31 studies examining social dilemma cooperation (N=13,447), I find that promoting intuition increases cooperation to a similar extent for both men and women. This stands in contrast to the results from 22 DG studies (analyzed in Rand et al., 2016) where intuition promotes giving among women but not men. Furthermore, I show using meta-regression that the interaction between gender and intuition is significantly larger in the DG compared to the cooperation games. Thus, I find clear evidence that the role of intuition and deliberation varies across both setting and individual as predicted by the SHH.

Trust Game In Teaching Economic Psychology In University: Results Of Empirical Investigation

“…Men and women are not significantly different in terms of trust and trustworthiness. Results are in agreement with recent meta-analysis related to the study of the behavior of men and women in such games revealed that there is no difference between their behavior in such games (Rand, 2017). Both men and women are equally inclined to show trust and trustworthiness.…”

“…Both men and women are equally inclined to show trust and trustworthiness. Perhaps this result is due to the influence of the so-called «social heuristics hypothesis» according to which people tend to choose a cooperative strategy of behavior to a large extent, based on the assumption that the other partner will also choose this strategy of behavior (Rand, 2017) and such ideas about the partner are typical for both men and women.…”

The dopaminergic reward system underpins gender differences in social preferences

“…A large body of evidence suggests that women often are more prosocial (e.g., generous, altruistic, and inequality averse) than men, at least when other factors such as reputation and strategic considerations are excluded [1][2][3] . This dissociation could result from cultural expectations and gender stereotypes, because in Western societies women are more strongly expected to be prosocial [4][5][6] and sensitive to variations in social context than men 1 .…”

Compatibility of Small Team Personalities in Computer-Based Tasks

“…Although there were efforts to keep the participant sample gender-balanced, this became a very challenging task in the researcher's department, where the vast majority of the student population is male. However, previous studies show that there are significant behavioral differences between males and females in issues that are relevant to our work, like competition [56] risk-taking [57], cooperation [58], altruism [59,60], honesty [61], etc. This implies that the present results should be seen under the light of female under-representation in the sample.…”