2023
DOI: 10.37990/medr.1296861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Determinants of Hip Fractures in Elderly Patients–A Case-Control Study

Mümin KARAHAN,
Mehmet Şah SAKÇI

Abstract: Purpose: Hip fractures are common orthopedic traumas and are known as a public health problem, especially in the elderly. Preventing fractures and determining risk factors are critical in reducing morbidity, mortality, and social and economic burden. This study aimed to investigate the social determinants affecting hip fractures. Methods: This is a case-control study conducted with a case group of 108 (36.1%) patients and a control group of 191 (63.9%). The dependent variable of the study was hip fractu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11][12][13] In a study from Turkey, it was stated that as a logical explanation for this, bone density decreases with age, and therefore the frequency of fractures may increase. 14 In a study conducted in Scotland, it was determined that even though the severity of the force causing the trauma was the same, the trauma severity scores of the elderly patients were higher than the young ones. The mention of the Scottish study can be taken as a second plausible explanation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13] In a study from Turkey, it was stated that as a logical explanation for this, bone density decreases with age, and therefore the frequency of fractures may increase. 14 In a study conducted in Scotland, it was determined that even though the severity of the force causing the trauma was the same, the trauma severity scores of the elderly patients were higher than the young ones. The mention of the Scottish study can be taken as a second plausible explanation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%