Social Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease

Abstract

Social determinants of health (SDoH), which encompass the economic, social, environmental, and psychosocial factors that influence health, play a significant role in the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors as well as CVD morbidity and mortality. The COVID-19 pandemic and the current social justice movement sparked by the death of George Floyd have laid bare long-existing health inequities in our society driven by SDoH. Despite a recent focus on these structural drivers of health disparities, the impact of SDoH on cardiovascular health and CVD outcomes remains understudied and incompletely understood. To further investigate the mechanisms connecting SDoH and CVD, and ultimately design targeted and effective interventions, it is important to foster interdisciplinary efforts that incorporate translational, epidemiological, and clinical research in examining SDoH-CVD relationships. This review aims to facilitate research coordination and intervention development by providing an evidence-based framework for SDoH rooted in the lived experiences of marginalized populations. Our framework highlights critical structural/socioeconomic, environmental, and psychosocial factors most strongly associated with CVD and explores several of the underlying biologic mechanisms connecting SDoH to CVD pathogenesis, including excess stress hormones, inflammation, immune cell function, and cellular aging. We present landmark studies and recent findings about SDoH in our framework, with careful consideration of the constructs and measures utilized. Finally, we provide a roadmap for future SDoH research focused on individual, clinical, and policy approaches directed towards developing multilevel community-engaged interventions to promote cardiovascular health.

The Geographic Context of Racial Disparities in Aggressive Endometrial Cancer Subtypes: Integrating Social and Environmental Aspects to Discern Biological Outcomes

“…While there are significant associations between SVI and both non-endometrioid EC and survival, the biological mechanism is still unknown. High social vulnerability may be associated with biological stress responses, as the cancer literature has previously used SVI to assess the community’s resiliency and vulnerability from external stressors [ 30 , 31 , 49 , 50 , 51 ]. Future studies could better define why Black women and women residing in areas of high SVI are more frequently diagnosed with non-endometrioid EC.…”

‘Obesities’: Position statement on a complex disease entity with multifaceted drivers

“…Noteworthy, social determinants of health, constituted by social, psychosocial and economic factors influencing health, exert a relevant role in the pathogenesis of CVD risk and morbi‐mortality. Several of the underlying physiological mechanisms linking development of CVD to social determinants of health have been analysed, and encompass inflammation, elevated stress hormones, immune cell activation, and cellular aging 40–42 …”

“…Several of the underlying physiological mechanisms linking development of CVD to social determinants of health have been analysed, and encompass inflammation, elevated stress hormones, immune cell activation, and cellular aging. [40][41][42] Transformation is part of the clinical profession, and it is the clinicians' responsibility to look for better ways to care for patients. Although transforming care delivery can feel intimidating, to be successful clinicians need the skills to develop trusting relationships with patients at the same time as sharing evidence-based knowledge with colleagues.…”

Community-Based Participatory Research to Improve Cardiovascular Health Among US Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups

“…Many LS7 health behaviors and clinical factors are impacted by social determinants of health (SDoH). SDoH are the economic, social, environmental, and psychosocial conditions in which individuals are born, grow, live, work, and age [ 5 , 6 ]. These conditions are shaped by the distribution of resources and power at local and national levels [ 5 ].…”