PsycEXTRA Dataset 2010
DOI: 10.1037/e616012010-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Desirability Doesn't Moderate the Validity of the NEO PI-R

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future studies, therefore, should employ a longitudinal design. Second, the data were gathered through self-report questionnaires, which could have introduced a social desirability bias (Holden & Passey, 2009). Third, data were collected using convenience sampling, resulting in a nonrepresentative sample in terms of gender, education, and marital status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies, therefore, should employ a longitudinal design. Second, the data were gathered through self-report questionnaires, which could have introduced a social desirability bias (Holden & Passey, 2009). Third, data were collected using convenience sampling, resulting in a nonrepresentative sample in terms of gender, education, and marital status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, social desirability is a problem whereby the respondents tend to show bias to reflect good behavior by conceiving negative information. Some researchers suggested that by maintaining the anonymity of the survey, social desirability bias can be minimized (Holden and Passey, 2009). In addition to maintaining anonymity, we also randomized the survey questions so that respondents do not guess the purpose of the research.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it can be viewed as a bias which may have an attenuating effect on the validity of self-report inventories. However the presence and importance of SDR has a long history of polarized discussion (Holden & Passey, 2009) with some viewing it as a prominent bias and others dismissing it as unimportant. The purpose of this manuscript is to summarize the literature in the area and then relate this larger literature to the research in counseling psychology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%