Stylistic Manipulation of the Reader in Contemporary Fiction 2020
DOI: 10.5040/9781350062993.0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social deixis in literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As McIntyre (2006) puts it, deictic centres refer ‘not just to a speaker or hearer’s location in space and time, but also to their position in social hierarchy’ (p. 92). While Macrae (2020) notes that there is ‘at present no clear agreement on what comprises [social] deixis’ (p. 53), Stockwell (2019) has suggested that ‘modality [. .…”
Section: Point Of View In Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As McIntyre (2006) puts it, deictic centres refer ‘not just to a speaker or hearer’s location in space and time, but also to their position in social hierarchy’ (p. 92). While Macrae (2020) notes that there is ‘at present no clear agreement on what comprises [social] deixis’ (p. 53), Stockwell (2019) has suggested that ‘modality [. .…”
Section: Point Of View In Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lambrou analyses these endings, one a counterfactual daydream and the others two ‘what if’ endings which construct a ‘forking path’ on the narrative road, in light of the concept of metalepsis (Genette, 1980) to demonstrate the ultimate manipulative power of the author/narrator. Macrae (2020a) explores social deixis in literature, examining a range of overlapping deictic categories to offer two main social deictic sub-types, Attitudinal-experiential deixis and Socio-relational deixis, which are applied to the last stanza of ‘Do not go gentle into that good night’ by Dylan Thomas. These two social deictic sub-types highlight the shifting addressees in this verse, between reader and ‘my father’ and potentially God, and foreground therefore the somewhat ambivalent status of the reader.…”
Section: Lockdown Stylistics Continuedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social deixis, in particular, has covered a large category of features compared with the other useful divisions to the extent that different thinkers (such as Macrae, 2019 and Semino, 2011) have explored ways of differentiating within that classification. The scope of my own category (Stockwell, 2000, drawn from Levinson’s (1983) relational deixis) has been described as ‘unusually wide’ and ‘markedly rich’ (Macrae, 2020: 57) since I included any aspect of sociocultural positioning that anchored the meaning of an utterance. (Most recently, I have fallen in line with others working in cognitive poetics in describing this category as ‘social deixis’: Stockwell, 2020).…”
Section: Social Deixismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most cognitive poetic studies have focused either on the main egocentric aspects of deixis or (as in Macrae’s, 2019 work) on textual and compositional matters collectively subsumed as discourse deixis (see also Gibbons, 2012; Gibbons and Macrae, 2018). Aside from Macrae (2020), there has been little cognitive poetic work on social deixis (though see Glover and Al-Tekreeti, 2018; Horton, 1999).…”
Section: Social Deixis As Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%