2015
DOI: 10.1080/02732173.2014.1000552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Control and Intersectionality: A Multilevel Analysis of School Misconduct, Location, Race, Ethnicity, and Sex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, because boys tend to receive harsher discipline (Ferguson 2001), the analyses include percent male students. The size of student enrollment (Byrd et al 2015) and grade levels taught (Kupchik 2010) are also related to the punitiveness of disciplinary responses, with smaller schools and primary schools generally using milder responses. Accordingly, we include school size and grade level, operationalized with dummy variables (yes = 1, no = 0) for primary school and middle school, with high school serving as the reference category.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, because boys tend to receive harsher discipline (Ferguson 2001), the analyses include percent male students. The size of student enrollment (Byrd et al 2015) and grade levels taught (Kupchik 2010) are also related to the punitiveness of disciplinary responses, with smaller schools and primary schools generally using milder responses. Accordingly, we include school size and grade level, operationalized with dummy variables (yes = 1, no = 0) for primary school and middle school, with high school serving as the reference category.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, our review showed that most of the analyzed studies centered on the predictors and correlates of deviance. It highlights their focus on revealing and characterizing the predictors of deviance, mainly using strain theory (Aseltine et al, 2000;Cheung and Cheung, 2010;Adamczyk, 2012;Bruno et al, 2012;Scheuerman, 2019), social control (Free, 1992;Woodward et al, 2001;Jang, 2002;Byrd et al, 2015), social learning theories (Barnes and Farrell, 1992;Benda, 1994;Winfree et al, 1994;Terrell, 1997;Regnerus, 2002), or routine opportunity theories (Osgood et al, 1996;Marcum et al, 2010;Maimon and Browning, 2012b;Ragan et al, 2014;Yuan and McNeeley, 2018). As we observed from the manual analysis of the 488 articles, this is mainly done through quantitative analysis; 348 articles out of 488 were examined using quantitative methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Byrd and colleagues (2015), inequality based on race, school location, and class can pose barriers to school stability as it relates to problems in teacher turnover and limited resources. Specifically, and in the context of social control theory, rural schools can be more vulnerable to disciplinary issues as the school may not be able to establish a strong bond between teachers, underrepresented students, and the school (Byrd et al 2015). In other words, disparities in rural schools may be affected by lack of community bonding and perceptions of BISOC, as the racial/ethnic demographics shift.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%