2022
DOI: 10.1177/09564624211069236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social contextual factors associated with lifetime HIV testing among the Tushirikiane urban refugee youth cohort in Kampala, Uganda: Cross-sectional findings

Abstract: Background Urban refugee youth may live in social contexts characterized by structural drivers of HIV such as poverty and violence. Knowledge gaps remain regarding HIV testing practices among urban refugee youth, despite the increasing trend toward refugee settlement in urban contexts. This study examined social contextual factors associated with lifetime HIV testing among urban refugee youth in Kampala, Uganda. Methods We conducted a community-based study with a peer-recruited cohort of urban refugee youth ag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adolescent sexual and reproductive health (SRH) stigma was assessed using the Ugandan version [ 9 ] of the Adolescent SRH Stigma scale [ 54 ]. The study's scale reliability scores are reported elsewhere [ 55 ]. Due to data collection issues leading to differential item non‐response by study arms, scales, including the CUSES (modified scale, six of eight original items): α = 0.90; Adolescent SRH Stigma (modified scale, 12 of 14 original items): α = 0.86 and SRP Scale (modified scale, 14 of 15 original items): α = 0.89, were modified to use only questions asked to all participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adolescent sexual and reproductive health (SRH) stigma was assessed using the Ugandan version [ 9 ] of the Adolescent SRH Stigma scale [ 54 ]. The study's scale reliability scores are reported elsewhere [ 55 ]. Due to data collection issues leading to differential item non‐response by study arms, scales, including the CUSES (modified scale, six of eight original items): α = 0.90; Adolescent SRH Stigma (modified scale, 12 of 14 original items): α = 0.86 and SRP Scale (modified scale, 14 of 15 original items): α = 0.89, were modified to use only questions asked to all participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher scores indicated the presence of higher perceived HIV-related stigma. Following the distribution, sums of scores were dichotomized using a median cut-off of > 32, indicating high perceived HIV-related stigma, which was coded as “1.” This scale has previously been used with displaced youth living in urban slums in Uganda [ 69 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belief in harmful inequitable gender norms were assessed using the gender belief scale (Cronbach α = 0.76). Responses include “strongly agree,” “agree,” “disagree,” and “strongly disagree” [ 69 ]. We reverse coded the items, and summed them up so that high scores represented more traditional beliefs about gender roles and low scores indicated low progressive beliefs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Studies conducted among urban refugee youth in Kampala, Uganda have found that inequitable gender norms and intersecting forms of stigma, including HIV-related stigma and refugee stigma, may also limit HIV testing and prevention engagement among refugee youth. [12][13][14][15] Social network breakdown, poverty and travel distance to clinics, confidentiality concerns, language barriers and other logistic hurdles may also present obstacles to HIV testing. 16 17 HIV self-testing (HIVST) is a promising approach documented across systematic reviews to increase HIV testing access and uptake.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is limited inclusion of refugee adolescents and youth in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) research and programming8–10 that may result in a lack of age, gender, and culturally tailored programmes, which in turn may contribute to low engagement with HIV testing and prevention services in humanitarian contexts 11. Studies conducted among urban refugee youth in Kampala, Uganda have found that inequitable gender norms and intersecting forms of stigma, including HIV-related stigma and refugee stigma, may also limit HIV testing and prevention engagement among refugee youth 12–15. Social network breakdown, poverty and travel distance to clinics, confidentiality concerns, language barriers and other logistic hurdles may also present obstacles to HIV testing 16 17…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%