2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social context and sexual intercourse among first-year students at selective colleges and universities in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Other scholars who question the pervasiveness of the hookup note that any examination of student sexual histories and experiences should consider culture and context as mechanisms informing student sexual decisions (Eaton et al, ; Holman & Sillars, ; Reid, Webber, & Elliott, ). These factors include the diversity and size of racial, class, and sexual minority groups on campus, the influence of peer groups, and university housing options as conduits for forging social and potential sexual contact on college campuses (Armstrong & Hamilton, ; Uecker, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other scholars who question the pervasiveness of the hookup note that any examination of student sexual histories and experiences should consider culture and context as mechanisms informing student sexual decisions (Eaton et al, ; Holman & Sillars, ; Reid, Webber, & Elliott, ). These factors include the diversity and size of racial, class, and sexual minority groups on campus, the influence of peer groups, and university housing options as conduits for forging social and potential sexual contact on college campuses (Armstrong & Hamilton, ; Uecker, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An inhabited approach to the study of women's sexual decision making as students adopts a new angle for understanding the variability of actor responses within similar organizational environments, and acknowledges the cultivation of unique campus cultures across the thousands of four-year universities in the United States. An inhabited approach to the study of campus sexual life also contributes to the broader literature on hookup cultures, which finds differences in sexual behavior and experience of hookups across individual identities (Ahrold and Meston 2010;Barrios and Lundquist 2012;Berntson et al 2014;Eaton et al 2015;Kuperberg and Padgett 2015;Owen et al 2010;Rupp et al 2014;Spell 2016), as well as in response to university structures, such as the size, racial and gendered composition of its undergraduate population, or the availability of on-campus housing (Adkins et al 2015;Allison and Risman 2014;Uecker 2015). The present study adds a different dimension to this literature in its finding that, in addition to negotiating sexual relationships in response to individual identities and structural constraints, women also frame their decisions to seek out or engage in particular sexual relationships in ways that are consistent with, or adaptive to, the broader organizational culture of a given school.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional studies find student engagement in dating and relationships at rates similar to that of hooking up (Bradshaw et al 2010;England et al 2003;Kuperberg and Padgett 2015), and that student desire for more committed relationships has not been fully supplanted by the perceived predominance of hookups (England and Bearak 2014;Freitas 2008). While peer networks (Berntson et al 2014;Uecker 2015) and structural arrangements, such as the gendered or racial demographics of a campus (Kuperberg and Padgett 2015;Ray and Rosow 2010), are cited as variables influencing the sexual decisions of undergraduates, less is known about how organizational cultures specific to a university become implicated in student negotiation of sexual relationships, be it hookups or relationships. Campus sexual cultures are not monolithic but are developed in local context and negotiated in varied ways by organizational actors.…”
Section: Sex and Relationships On America's College Campusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relationships influence a person’s behavior above and beyond the influence of individual attributes [ 2 ]. This is particularly true of health behaviors—smoking, eating, and sex are all socially shaped behaviors [ 3 5 ]. Diffusion of information and innovation often occurs through personal networks, which are shaped by geographic, ethnic, and socioeconomic factors [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%