Sexuality, Society, and Feminism.
DOI: 10.1037/10345-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social constructions of sexuality: Unpacking hidden meanings.

Abstract: Sexuality is an ambiguous term. It can refer to a variety of phenomena, including sexual identity, sexual preference, and sexual behavior. Depending on one's theoretical perspective, sexuality may be defined in physiological, intrapersonal, or interpersonal terms. Following from these perspectives there are questions regarding what constitutes sexuality. Is sexuality to be defined by physiological reactions in certain body parts, but not others? When does one experience sexuality? Is it lodged in one's sense o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical research clearly indicates that men are more likely to desire multiple short-term mating relationships (for a review see Baumeister, Catanese, & Vohs, 2001) and to display sexual aggression. These sex differences are accepted within both the evolutionary psychology literature (e.g., Allgeier & Wiederman, 1994; Buss, 2007) and the social constructivism literature (e.g., Travis, 1999; White, Bondurant, & Travis, 2000). However, these two perspectives explain sex differences in mate selection strategies in divergent ways.…”
Section: Evolutionary and Social-constructivist Perspectives On Male mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Empirical research clearly indicates that men are more likely to desire multiple short-term mating relationships (for a review see Baumeister, Catanese, & Vohs, 2001) and to display sexual aggression. These sex differences are accepted within both the evolutionary psychology literature (e.g., Allgeier & Wiederman, 1994; Buss, 2007) and the social constructivism literature (e.g., Travis, 1999; White, Bondurant, & Travis, 2000). However, these two perspectives explain sex differences in mate selection strategies in divergent ways.…”
Section: Evolutionary and Social-constructivist Perspectives On Male mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, we see that at every stage of development, women are the victims of intimate violence more often than men (White, Bondurant, & Travis, 2000). We see the differential pattern of diagnosis and treatment of physical and mental health problems across the lifespan (Travis & Compton, 2001), and we see differential patterns in education that place girls and boys on different academic trajectories, with the consequent result of different achievement and career outcomes (Gutek, 2001;Hyde & Kling, 2001).…”
Section: Expanding the Range Of Acceptable Research Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The understanding of fundamental social roles continually changes with political and economic climates, and thus gender can be said to be a socially constructed definition imposed on individuals rather than an inherent feature of them (Parker & Shotter, 1990;Unger, 1989;White, Bondurant, & Travis, 2000).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bref, l'approche féministe postmoderne examine des concepts tels que la langue, le discours, la différence, la déconstruction et la position (positionality) (ArslanianEngoren, 2002;Saulnier, 1996). Cette approche invite à la reconnaissance de réalités multiples, toutes valables et légitimes (White et al, 2000). Chaque énoncé n'est qu'une représentation partielle et particulière d'une expérience donnée (Gannon & Davies, 2007).…”
Section: Objectifs Du Projet De Rechercheunclassified