2016
DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2016.1196949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Concern and Delinquency: An Empirical Assessment of a Novel Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was illustrated through bivariate and multivariate analyses, and they provided support for the first study hypothesis. These results were also generally consistent with previous tests of SCT (Chouhy et al, 2017; Craig, 2017; Hong et al, 2019; Shadmanfaat et al, 2021; TenEyck & Barnes, 2018). Our study explicitly used measures of social concern as developed by Agnew (2014) and was the first, as far as we know, to use SCT in the explanation of individual differences in COVID-19 misbehavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This was illustrated through bivariate and multivariate analyses, and they provided support for the first study hypothesis. These results were also generally consistent with previous tests of SCT (Chouhy et al, 2017; Craig, 2017; Hong et al, 2019; Shadmanfaat et al, 2021; TenEyck & Barnes, 2018). Our study explicitly used measures of social concern as developed by Agnew (2014) and was the first, as far as we know, to use SCT in the explanation of individual differences in COVID-19 misbehavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In a study of Iranian high school students, Shadmanfaat et al (2021) found that the social concern components had both direct and indirect effects on students' cyberbullying perpetration. Chouhy et al's (2017) study of adolescent delinquency found mixed results. Care for others and moral intuitions were negatively associated with delinquency, but desire for close ties and conformity were unrelated to delinquency.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measurement scheme ranges from Disagree (1) through Agree (3). The items were combined to create a composite measure with higher values consistent with more favorable definitions toward delinquency, which is similar with that utilized in prior work (e.g., Bandura et al, 1996;Chouhy et al, 2017;Mulford et al, 2018).…”
Section: Definitions (Moral Thinking/beliefs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And whereas social learning/rational choice theory extends this perspective by focusing on moral emotions (Grasmick et al 1993), guilt and shame are usually measured as anticipated emotions in response to (self-reported) projected involvement in acts of offending (i.e., how guilty would you feel if you stole something from someone) (but, see Van Gelder et al 2014). And, in the handful of studies that have attempted to test social concern theory (e.g., Chouhy, Hochstetler, and Cullen 2017; Shadmanfaat et al 2020), the “moral intuitions” component of social concern is operationalized using Bandura et al’s (1996) “moral disengagement” scale, which includes items such as “damaging property is no big deal…,” “it is alright to beat someone who bad mouths your family,” and “it is all right to fight when your group’s honor is threatened”—all of which are clearly linked to offending.…”
Section: Limitations Of Criminological Measures Of Moralitymentioning
confidence: 99%