2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social-cognitive theory variables as correlates of sedentary behavior in multiple sclerosis: Preliminary evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study involved a secondary analysis of previously published data. 27 Briefly, participants were recruited through the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) patient registry. The recruitment occurred through the random selection of 1000 persons with MS who completed the biannual NARCOMS registry update survey (Fall, 2017) who were mailed letters by NARCOMS staff; this sample size was selected based on an expectation of 25% participation in the current study as estimated by NARCOMS.…”
Section: Participant Recruitment and Eligibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study involved a secondary analysis of previously published data. 27 Briefly, participants were recruited through the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) patient registry. The recruitment occurred through the random selection of 1000 persons with MS who completed the biannual NARCOMS registry update survey (Fall, 2017) who were mailed letters by NARCOMS staff; this sample size was selected based on an expectation of 25% participation in the current study as estimated by NARCOMS.…”
Section: Participant Recruitment and Eligibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study involved a secondary analysis of data from a relatively large sample of persons with MS 27 and examined the associations among fatigue, based on the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) 28 and device-measured LPA and MVPA as well as sedentary behavior among people with MS; we focused on sedentary behavior, LPA, and MVPA, rather than steps or other variables, based on a representation of the activity continuum. 24 Such an inquiry overcomes the aforementioned problems of previous research in this area, and provides a novel, comprehensive examination of fatigue and physical activity across the activity continuum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NHANES study measured PA and SB objectively using accelerometery, whereas the present study used self-reported SB time with the IPAQ. In a study that examined both self-reported and accelerometery-based SB time in people with multiple sclerosis, self-reported SB time was 505.6 min/day while the accelerometer detected SB time was 548.5 min/day (19). No studies to date have reported on self-reported or objectively measured SB in people living with dystonia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, self-reported measures significantly underestimate sedentary time compared to device measures 15 and typically provide estimates of volume, but not patterns of SB. Similarly, studies examining objective SB have reported age, MS type, disease duration, disability status via the Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) scale 16 and fatigue 17 as correlates, with more recent research showing associations with Social Cognitive Theory constructs 18 . However, these studies used hip-mounted accelerometers, which characterise sedentary behaviour through periods of inactivity measured by count-based movement thresholds (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies used hip-mounted accelerometers, which characterise sedentary behaviour through periods of inactivity measured by count-based movement thresholds (e.g. < 100 counts per min) 16 , 18 . Since movement is determined by acceleration rather than body posture they cannot robustly differentiate between sitting and upright positions and may misclassify static postures such as standing as sedentary behaviour 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%