2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1389-0417(01)00053-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social cognition, artefacts, and stigmergy: A comparative analysis of theoretical frameworks for the understanding of artefact-mediated collaborative activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if the term stigmergy has been primarily used for typically reactive (non-rational) agents, its relationship with cognition was investigated for the first time by Susi and Ziemke [15]. The authors conclude with the assertion that the conceptual framework of stigmergy offers a common denominator for the social sciences theories (i.e., activity theory; situated and distributed cognition).…”
Section: Stigmergy and Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Even if the term stigmergy has been primarily used for typically reactive (non-rational) agents, its relationship with cognition was investigated for the first time by Susi and Ziemke [15]. The authors conclude with the assertion that the conceptual framework of stigmergy offers a common denominator for the social sciences theories (i.e., activity theory; situated and distributed cognition).…”
Section: Stigmergy and Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This phenomenon leverages the innate survival instinct of each individual in the absence or lack of direct communication and central planning. (Susi & Ziemke, 2001;Theraulaz & Bonabeau, 1999) Individual action in the environment produces temporary or permanent changes (sign). These changes in the absence of direct communication triggers further action and sign-based-feedback to other agents in the shared environment.…”
Section: Reigning the Growing Beast: Design Approach For Collective Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Marsh & Onof, 2008;H. V. D. Parunak, 2005;Susi & Ziemke, 2001;Theraulaz & Bonabeau, 1999) It explains social cohesion at two levels, firstly, 'inter-attraction' between society and individuals and 'interaction' between neighboring agents at the local level that facilitates interconnected response of agents to stimuli/action in a shared environment (Dipple, Raymond, & Docherty, 2014;Heylighen, 2015;Marsh & Onof, 2008;Ricci, Omicini, Viroli, Gardelli, & Oliva, 2007;Susi & Ziemke, 2001). Individual insects cannot survive alone, but collective inter-attraction and interaction assists in their optimal adaptation and survival from external conditions.…”
Section: Stigmergic Design Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Human organisation and organisation infrastructures, that are populated by humans (as participants and part of the organisation machinery), and by rich sets of artifacts and tools that humans use to support their activities inside the organisation and the organisation itself, encapsulating essential infrastructure services. According to psycho-sociological theories and studies such as Activity Theory and Distributed Cognition [22]-recently adopted in computer science fields such as CSCW, HCI and MAS [32,31,27]-the notion of artifact (and tool, taken here as a synonym) plays a key role for the overall sustainability of an organisation and the effectiveness and efficiency of activities taking place inside the organisation.…”
Section: An Organisational Infrastructures Based On Agents and Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 99%