Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale as level of personality
                        functioning.

Garcia, Darren J.; Crittenden, E. Bailey; Skadberg, Rebecca M.; Finn, Michael T. M.; Schmidt, Megan; Kurdziel-Adams, Gretchen; Waugh, Mark H.

doi:10.1037/pap0000369

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Test–retest reliability for the SCORS-G variables ranges from small ( r = .30) to medium ( r = .52; Ridenour et al, 2022). The SCORS-G has been used to assess changes in ORs over the course of psychotherapy (e.g., Mullin et al, 2017), to assess the Level of Personality Functioning in the context of Criterion A of the AMPD (Garcia et al, 2021), to investigate the role of quality of ORs in the severity of personality dysfunction (Joyce et al, 2022), and in many other studies to investigate ORs in depth and complexity. We point out that a study exploring the convergence of the SCORS-G across early memories and psychotherapy narratives (Slavin-Mulford et al, 2020) found that only three out of eight dimensions significantly correlated with themselves across narrative types; therefore, it looks like different narrative sources tend to activate different aspects of ORs.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowing me, knowing you: A systematic review of object relations assessment.

Felici¹,

Madeddu²,

Doering³

et al. 2023

Psychoanalytic Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tools for assessing object relations (ORs) are fundamental for psychodynamic theory, research, and practice. ORs play an important role in diagnostic and therapeutic processes, helping therapists to better understand and manage complex relational functioning in their patients. The clinical relevance of OR is also recognized by the first criterion of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. Our goal is to provide clinicians and researchers with an updated review of the available empirical tools to assess OR. We conducted a systematic search on APA PsycInfo and Pubmed and retrieved 42 instruments from the existing literature. Some of these assessment tools are well established in the scientific community. Among the less popular ones, we identified some instruments that show good potential and may be granted a further round of validation. We encourage the development of existing and new instruments within the framework of Kernberg's theory of personality organization, and a further inquiry into qualitative aspects of ORs dyads, which may help therapists obtain more sophisticated information on their patients' relational functioning.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowing me, knowing you: A systematic review of object relations assessment.

Felici¹,

Madeddu²,

Doering³

et al. 2023

Psychoanalytic Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Assessing Criterion A of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: The Potential of Performance-Based Personality Measures

Rucker,

Berry,

Sharp

2024

Journal of Personality Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The conceptualization of personality disorder has been refined through recent nosological advances introduced in the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). These advances locate self and interpersonal (dys)function at the core of personality pathology. Self-report personality assessment instruments have demonstrated promise in the assessment of Criterion A domains. However, research highlighting the utility of performance-based personality assessment instruments has been largely absent in these advances, despite acknowledgment of their potential. We adhered to PRISMA review guidelines to survey and assess the potential relevance and utility of select performance-based personality instruments in assessing Criterion A domains of the AMPD. We conclude that performance-based personality measures are uniquely positioned to assess maladaptive self- and interpersonal functioning and may address some limitations of self-report measures. Toward this end, we propose a working model that provides ranges of test scores that correspond to the 5-point scale of the Criterion A domains of the AMPD.

show abstract

Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale as level of personality functioning.

Cited by 2 publications

References 47 publications

Knowing me, knowing you: A systematic review of object relations assessment.

Knowing me, knowing you: A systematic review of object relations assessment.

Assessing Criterion A of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: The Potential of Performance-Based Personality Measures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About