“…The results of several studies (Armsby, 1971;Bandura and McDonald, 1963;Boehm and Nass, 1962;Cowan etal., 1969;Durkin, 1959Durkin, , 1961Garbarino arid Bronfenbrenner, 1976;Holstein, 1976;Johnson, 1962;Keasey, \91S;L e Furgy and Woloshin, 1969;MacRae, 1954;Magowan and Lee, 1970;Medinnas, 1959) and the analyses of several reviewers (Aronfreed, 1976;Bull, 1969;Douglas, 1972;Graham, 1972;Kay, 1970;Lickona, 1969Lickona, , 1976Mischel and Mischel, 1976;Simpson, 1974) indicate that response variation in moral reasoning can be a function of factors in addition to those covert conditions of disequilibrium thought to underly the phenomenon of stage mixture. Many of the above articles report person and task effects on moral reasoning and as such appear to support Kurtines and Grief's (1974, p. 467) assertion that 'modes of moral thought are subject to social influence'.…”